The aggressor is always peace-loving (as Bonaparte always claimed to be); he would prefer to take over our country unopposed. —Carl von Clausewitz
We are being purposefully overwhelmed by false inputs. Our enemy’s strategy is to serve us truth salted with lies. This is meant to intimidate, keep us off solid ground, and psych us out so we lose without a fight. Exposing yourself to popular culture and current events reported by the media is the death of your intellect. Although we need sources to educate ourselves, we must eliminate everything we can, for what we ignore has become more critical than what we read.
I use my Reality Rules (Appendix) to throw out a lot. You may disagree with some of the following, but try to hang with me long enough to understand my reasoning.
Never trust a meal—even a gourmet one—with a rotten side dish. Once someone has lied to you, you must ghost them to maintain your integrity and discernment. (To ghost: end all contact, ignore them, and kill their feeds.)
In a short time, on the advice of a fortune teller, Mercola recently fired his top management and supposedly changed his mind about some of his key ideas. I studied one of these, hormone therapy, for a decade and spent a year researching and writing a book about it. The Cartel has opposed it. It is safe and healthy and makes us stronger. Mercola’s new arguments against it are wrong.
I have also extensively studied keto/carnivore diets, another of his about-faces. His new ideas promoting carbohydrate consumption are wrong. More recently, Mercola reversed himself about going barefoot. He had advocated this for “grounding,” but now he says he has a bunion and that shoes are best. He also supposedly quit deep breathing. The same day he did that, he proclaimed, “Lifting weights kills you.” He had been a gym rat for a decade.
Mercola may have had a mental breakdown or succumbed to pressure, but worrying about what happened occupies too much bandwidth for me to bother. Whether bribed or threatened, he changed his mind about telling the truth, so it makes no difference to us. After hanging on his every word for years, I killed my paid subscription and ghosted him. My doubts extend to his business; I now get my supplements elsewhere.
You are also known by the company you keep; if you support or cavort with shills, what you say is unreliable. For example, although Meryl Nass is obviously sincere, her repeated defense of Robert Malone cast doubt on her judgment and ruined her credibility. (Read Sasha Latypova HERE if you need clarification about Malone.) I ghosted Nass.
Another Malone hanger-on is a Substack writer with whom I socialized and treated generously. He recently told me to my face that this supposed “inventor of mRNA” was busy saving us from the World Health Organization. Res ipsa loquitur—the lie speaks for itself, especially one as stupid as this (HERE is a WHO commentator you can rely on). Of course, there is more to this fellow, but that is enough for you. My trust in him evaporated, so I ghosted him.
Mike Adams is seductively eloquent but regularly devolves into blathering idiocy about space invaders and cyborg warriors. I think he claims an alien visitation of ancient Egypt, but rereading his nonsense to get this point precisely right is more than I can stomach. If you are interested in the true origins of the pyramids instead of mysticism, see THIS fascinating and science-based article in Mathew Crawford’s blog.
Adam’s behavior is a firm marker for a chaos agent inserted into our midst to confuse and dishearten us. Even before I put my thoughts together, I was ghosting him because my spider sense told me all I needed to know.
Some “Freedom Movement” icons gave me the creeps from the start, so I never followed them. I am now suspicious of some of the most prominent ones—even those who direct us to store food, start banks, and worry about our chickens. These may be good ideas, but they could be intimidation tactics. As I reflect on “Spartacus,” I am not sure about him, either.
Others are still saying, “Mistakes were made.” Everyone in my room knows the vax was a purposely deployed bioweapon (ref: Cassandra’s Memo, 2023), so ghost anyone who makes this ridiculous claim.
While it is possible that some “resistance leaders” made honest mistakes, and some have since changed their minds, you have no time to worry about it. As my dear friend Tuttle says, Screw all these people and the horses they rode in on.
Learning the truth about today’s events fries many people’s brain circuits, and only a minority have the skills, courage, and intellect to consider all the contradictory ideas. If my views disturb you, try holding them in your thoughts long enough to learn something. You do not have to adopt my opinions, but I will never distort what I say to make it palatable or retain readership.
Discerning graphene oxide requires outside expertise.
I asked George, a top engineer, for his opinion. Before I leave you to him, the following is what I learned on my own.
We know that the Covid vax is a toxic stew. Craig Paardekooper collaborated with Sasha Latypova and discovered evidence that Big Pharma did a dose-fatality study to learn what components would kill us best (See Chapter 11, Cassandra’s Memo). Graphene oxide (GO) is in some of the vials.
However, some say that the “vaccine” contains self-assembling microscopic robots and that graphene oxide (GO) will activate inside us to turn us into androids… or maybe even “Freedom Movement” false flag fakers.
To investigate, a Substack reader advised me to look at La Quinta Columna (LQC), a group whose name means an undercover group of rebel sympathizers. In Spain last month, they showed me a Bluetooth iPhone app displaying alphanumeric codes supposedly generated by graphene oxide inside vaxxed people.
Photo credit: Yoho.
Codes like these appear for Bluetooth connections to standard technology. Capital letters at the start of the alphanumeric string identify each device and company. However, smaller companies frequently ignore this rule and use only numbers.
GO is metal and creates magnetic effects. Some newly jabbed people have this at their deltoid injection site, but it goes away after a day or so as the material redistributes. Others who have had recent major surgery have more generalized reactions. This video was taken after coronary artery bypass grafting.* The working hypothesis is that the magnetic effect is from graphene oxide in anesthetics and other drugs. However, this guy also has an unknown number of steel surgical clips from the procedure.
*NB: This surgery is a plumbing job designed to send blood around coronary artery blockages. However, it kills 3-8 percent of patients immediately, gives 30-60 % of them brain damage, and has a negligible effect on the only meaningful success metric—longevity. See Butchered by “Healthcare” to learn more.
The following video is similar, but I do not know its origins or explanation.
LQC people are worried. They told me:
-
GO has been seen by light microscopy in most European bottled waters and many prescription medicines. Darkfield microscopy is not necessary to visualize the characteristic stranding pattern.
-
Devices costing about $1000 can direction-find the source of the above alphanumeric codes. This provides evidence that the signals are emitted from people.
-
Most, but not all, unvaccinated people do not display these codes. This may have implications for shedding.
-
The codes change about every half-hour and can be seen on the BLE scanner iPhone app. Some are preceded by letters identifying the commercial device they are associated with. The iPhone cannot direction-find like the more expensive devices.
-
An electromagnet that permanently destroys cell phones and other electronics can be constructed for less than $50 using components purchased at Radio Shack. The “ZAPPER” video shows how to make it and how the Bluetooth signals from people disappear after moving the magnet over the people displaying the codes. This is harmless for most individuals, but some report adverse reactions.
-
I heard about people with “long-term COVID” (translated: Vax injury) with these signals who improve clinically after they were “zapped.” I have heard rumors that a few of them got worse. I have not interviewed first-hand witnesses for either story.
My source inside LQC has known about this zapper business for two years. However, they have not deployed them to rescue us even though they fear that this situation may someday be used to damage or control us through 5G radiation… or something like that.
LQC references
THIS is their website. It is partly Spanish.
“Impact of electromagnetic fields on in vitro toxicity of silver and graphene nanoparticles” is an academic article available HERE. The full text can be accessed on Sci-Hub.ru HERE. (To try this yourself, search for any article title at sci-hub.ru.)
George’s training and experience qualify him to discern the truth here.
Because of his background in tech, Bluetooth, and systems engineering, he is the ideal person to evaluate this story. Although anonymous, his clarity of thought and insights reveal his expertise. When George worked with physicians in corporate settings, some threw their chests out and proclaimed they could learn his field in a few months or a year. They all fell short.
For twenty years, he has been trying to convince those around him that government regulators and medical authorities were working with the pharmaceutical industry to damage our health and well-being. No one listened. Since the pandemic exposed a whole new level of criminality, people have been paying attention.
This is what he told me
-
C-19 vaccines are laced with contaminants, some known and likely others that we have not yet discovered. The annals of medical manufacturing are rife with incidents of DNA contamination, and considering the unprecedented pace, the scant regulatory scrutiny, and the colossal scale at which these vaccines were produced, they must be contaminated.
-
Graphene oxide, a substance increasingly tainting various products, is found in many vaccine vials. Without extensive, transparent, and top-notch testing—which didn’t happen—dismissing graphene oxide contamination is naïve.
-
The phenomenon of people displaying magnetism is believable.
-
COVID vaccines are hazardous; many adverse effects have been documented, and others are likely to be discovered.
My friends often send me videos and articles to sort out claims involving technology. Here are some theories that are circulating:
-
Vaccines are spiked with graphene oxide to injure and kill us.
-
Graphene oxide is what magnetizes people.
-
Graphene oxide particles act like nanobots, assembling into microchips within our bodies.
-
These then supposedly evolve to function as both transmitters and receivers, capable of connecting to Bluetooth and potentially directing brain inserts to control the body.
-
The climax of this theory is that these nanobots are biding their time, waiting for a clandestine “off-switch” signal that could either zombify us or kill us.
Many of these theories are more like sensational sci-fi plots than plausible theories. What is believable and reasonable?
The graphene oxide found in vaccines points to contamination. Depending on its form, this can wreak havoc on the body, but only in certain ways. Sasha Latypova laid out potential impacts in her exceptional analysis HERE: “Is graphene toxic to the body? Depends on the formulation and structure. In formulations where it was found to be toxic (e.g., carbon nanotubes), the mechanism of injury is similar to that of asbestos (also a nanomaterial).”
Few people have done any experiments, and no one seems to have tested vaccine vials for magnetic properties.
The vaccine may create a magnetic reaction in individuals. However, magnetism has no relationship with Bluetooth or wireless communication capabilities. For example, neither a Bluetooth mouse nor microchips are magnetized.
Another speculative claim, the supposed link between self-assembling nanobots and graphene, is nonsense. Microchips capable of emitting Bluetooth signals are not made from graphene oxide. GO is unrelated to Bluetooth signals in any way I could fathom. The idea that vaccines could transform individuals into Bluetooth-manipulable zombies is absurd based on known technologies.
A video Dr. Yoho obtained from LQC (HERE) featured individuals in Panama utilizing a cell phone to pick up Bluetooth signals purportedly emanating from people. The narrator touts his qualifications, but the bulk of his presentation is riddled with what engineers would call technobabble. This is stringing technical jargon into sentences that are either nonsensical or blatantly incorrect. I saw this throughout the video. If someone with genuine expertise made the video, he used it deliberately to mislead. If not, he’s simply out of his depth.
Here are several of his baseless assertions:
-
He labels “unknown” Bluetooth addresses as an anomaly, which is wrong. Numerous budget-friendly devices opt for unregistered Bluetooth addresses to avoid registration fees; this is a common practice.
-
He suggests that Bluetooth signals are perpetually in “receive mode,” looking for commands from a central authority. This is standard Bluetooth behavior, aiming to establish connections with nearby devices. In covert operations, broadcasting anything would be counterintuitive; it’s more plausible to silently scan for a specific device before initiating a connection.
-
He posits that the sheer volume of Bluetooth signals detected indicates they must originate from within individuals. This is ridiculous. Today, it’s typical for individuals to carry multiple Bluetooth-emitting devices—phones, earpods, watches, bracelets, and, for the elderly, possibly pacemakers, all of which can broadcast Bluetooth.
-
Conducting a similar experiment with the same software at my home, I detected signals from my house and the neighbor’s, accounting for over 20 devices between just two households.
Bluetooth’s range varies widely, from 10 to 800 feet, depending on the version, with most devices capped at about 320 feet. This grants a single phone the potential to intercept signals from up to 320,000 square feet. Considering the video’s subjects were in a public space for an extended period, it’s no shock they encountered hundreds of signals in Panama—they were likely capturing every device within the radius of a 320,000-square-foot area.
The video proves that we are dealing with individuals who either do not understand what they are talking about or are telling lies to instill fear.
HERE is a second gibberish video Dr. Yoho got from a Spanish source who touted it as evidence of the theory described here. I’ve attached my detailed notes.
At first glance, Dr. Yoho’s resources seem to be of the high caliber we would expect from seasoned researchers. However, they lack clarity and leave us wondering about their hypotheses.
The study “Impact of electromagnetic fields on in vitro toxicity of silver and graphene nanoparticles” is the only one of good quality. Presumably, this study suggests a sinister purpose. The theory is that vaccines saturate individuals with toxic metal particles, and cellular toxicity increases when exposed to EMFs.
The other idea is that vaccines might emit “EMFs” via embedded Bluetooth transmitters. However, the study utilized exceptionally strong EMFs generated by equipment operating at 10W—far beyond the maximum output of any cell phone, old (2W) or new (0.25 watts).
In the lab conditions described, the EMF intensity was 50 times that of contemporary cell phones. An embedded device like a pacemaker, operating at such power levels, would exhaust its battery in no time.
This paper establishes a rigorous standard for confirming the presence of graphene and described the verification process used by the researchers. Secondly, it reports a counterintuitive finding: graphene exhibited a protective effect at 5G frequencies when combined with EMFs.
Thus, this paper does not lend credibility to the doomsday theories of vaccine-induced, self-assembling nanobots poised to unleash lethal EMFs or that vaccines are laced with toxic graphene oxide to be activated by 5G signals.
Another highlighted study from the LQC site that was seemingly authored by the site’s owners focused on detecting graphene oxide in vaccine formulations. However, while the EMF study employed three different methods to confirm the presence of graphene, this vaccine investigation relied on just one. Without corroboration from additional techniques, their conclusion, while plausible, falls short of being conclusive.
This brings us to another featured article on the site, which references a study published in Nature about the advantages of graphene-based neural sensors over their non-graphene counterparts. Accompanying this discussion is an image of a neural sensor (5.6mm or 0.2 inches wide and almost .5 inches long)—a device far too large to be surreptitiously inserted into the human brain, much less through the gauge of a vaccine needle. Moreover, the device’s composition is primarily non-graphene materials, casting further doubt on the feasibility of such theories.
While these papers contribute scientific insights, they dismantle rather than support the web of speculative narratives surrounding vaccines and graphene oxide.
The only conclusion I can form from all this is that graphene oxide is a probable contaminant of the vaccines. Returning to intent, here is the anonymous commentator, A Midwestern Doctor. He references people who did a decently rigorous assessment of a sampling of multiple vaccine vials.
I was relatively sure the vaccine doses were not the same (based on the observations I made), but I couldn’t explain why and hence considered a lot of hypotheses (e.g., different mRNA doses were being done as a large scale experiment). Now that the dust has settled, I believe the most likely explanation was simply poor manufacturing, which is by far the most benign explanation as it suggests many were spared from the severe consequences of these vaccines (as they received “duds”).
Note: inconsistent manufacturing is actually a longstanding issue, especially in products that are not subject to rigorous inspection. For instance, since all vaccines are “safe and effective” and simultaneously immune to lawsuits, much less of an incentive exists to monitor the quality of their manufacturing. To illustrate, in 2021, Christopher Exley’s team found that the aluminum content of childhood vaccines varied greatly from lot to lot (and the vaccine’s label), which, in my eyes, is significant since aluminum is the primary agent responsible for vaccine injuries.
To conclude:
-
A solid, all-encompassing theory or any shred of proof linking Bluetooth connectivity to the vaccinated masses remains elusive.
-
We’re inundated with dubious “evidence” that, at best, reveals a profound lack of understanding or a deliberate attempt to mislead us.
Should someone possess indisputable proof—garnered through appropriate equipment and under valid conditions—showing Bluetooth signals emanating solely from vaccinated individuals, please step forward. I will look closely. I have seen nothing linking Bluetooth and vaccination, but many misleading narratives exist.
Yoho:
We know the vaccine contains poisons, but my conclusion is that the effects described here are just poorly understood and possibly harmless artifacts. No one has been able to show substantial evidence of robots or graphene oxide activation. My current thinking is, “How could I have taken this seriously? I must have a screw loose.” Like the rest of you, I am susceptible to all kinds of ideas because I am shell-shocked by what has happened.
Magnetism is everywhere. I discovered a one-inch magnetic spot on my airplane tray table:
You have too much to do and too many other things to study to waste your time with questionable material. For correct discernment, your default must be to ignore stories supported by speculative evidence. When your spider sense activates, or even when you dislike someone, assume you are being lied to unless you have proof to the contrary. One clue is if the storyteller exhibits la belle indifference (absence of emotional distress) in the face of all the disasters. Some seem to be pretending they are in a science fiction novel. If you are asked what you think of one of these people, say what Ayn Rand would have, I never think of them.
Finally, believing the psychopaths possess advanced technology unrelated to anything we know of is akin to a belief in magic.
Epilogue: To gauge this war’s activity
We can observe the volume of weaponized lies. These are increasing, but many of us can now see through the haze and ignore them. This is reassuring, for if the jackals had trump cards, they would play them. Instead, they are intimidating the weaker among us with nightmarish fairy tales.
Eighty percent of the populace would immediately forget it all if the psychopaths backed off or at least slowed down. This has yet to happen, but we recall their past false starts. Swine flu, Brexit, and other events were failures. If we can get to the point where most of us see through the climate, carbon, and gender nonsense and all the rest, we can win. “Healthcare” butchery and the ruined food sources are hard to laugh off, but human resilience always amazes me. (Thanks to Dave Payette, who treated me to some of these ideas with dinner in London last month. NB: He disagrees with part of this post.)
Editing credit: Jim Arnold of Liar’s World Substack.
Pop quiz: Test your shill identification skills
Post your findings in the comments. My ideas are at the end.
-
Please scan this blog: “Methylene Blue is TOXIC WASTE. From Sewer to Arm: a Miracle Treatment?”
-
Next, look at Charles Wright.
Answers:
-
You don’t need to know about MB, but you can use my post HERE as a reference if you need one.
-
He discredits Pierre Kory and other resistance heroes; these are the credentials of a chaos agent attack dog.
Appendix: Yoho’s Reality Rules
#1. Basic principles:
-
Those with the gold make the rules, so learning the funding source explains a lot.
-
Lying and damaging others is a drive like sex for psychopaths. Never underestimate your ability to be fooled by them, for they do not telegraph duplicity like ordinary people (Chapter 2, Cassandra’s Memo).
#2. Identify what is true.
-
Believe your eyes, experience, and intuition, which is the sum of logic and emotions. Have confidence in your discernment powers and take little on faith or authority.
-
If a source contains explanations you do not understand, it can generally be cast off as false. Legal arguments often fall into this category. Some technical science fields that require decades of experience must be judged by assessing the person telling the tale.
#3. Use simple heuristics to unearth liars:
-
If one of our “colleagues” is all over YouTube, Facebook, or Instagram, he is part of a bowel movement, not the Freedom Movement. Judge us on what stays up and what gets censored. I am a small animal, but the jackals take down everything I put up on social media within 30 minutes.
-
“Anybody carrying water for archons, demons, alien invasions, or part-man, part-machine cyborg warriors is either a moron or a paid shill” (Polymath Paul).
-
Be suspicious of those who combine hysteria and apocalyptic religion.
-
Crediting powerful, previously unknown technology to psychopaths replaces our reasoning powers with atavistic fears about magic.
-
Events that are light-years of distance or eons of time away from us are science fiction. Thinking about them is not a practical approach that yields insights or action plans for today.
-
The future is unknowable, and predictions are often psyops (Thanks, M!).
-
Clues from cancel culture: What is forbidden to be debated cannot be true; if debate of a subject is actually illegal, it is an obvious lie. —Alan Sabrosky
Telling the truth to yourself and others is your highest value. You must ignore stories if they fail the above tests or are supported only by speculative or circumstantial evidence. If your spider sense activates, assume you are being lied to unless you have overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
It is refreshing to have a scientific discussion presented. Too many substacks propose theories without addressing a counter-explanation. That is not science, nor is it legal analysis. For the past four years – and much longer – we have been living under a system where both essential components have been stripped from analysis, meaning there is no analysis. The LCQ theory reminds me of braces or fillings amplifying AM radio waves. Surely, dentists and orthodontists did not intend for this outcome, but it occurred. So I side with George until further evidence. Even well-intentioned theories, if unfounded, add to the fog of war.
Thank you for this. Been so suspicious of many of the supposed medical freedom fighters.
Mathew Crawford diagrams how they have been infiltrated. More about him in a few weeks.
uD83DuDC40
I’m greatful for my grandparents understanding of the advent of television. They always called it propaganda.
my grandparents called it the idiot box, said watching it would make me an idiot and don’t ever allow other people to do my thinking for me.
Yes, back in the day people were more aware and intelligent.
Top of the article is excellent. The last time I watched Mercola interviewed (CHD) my jaw dropped to the floor. It served as the fuel to move past both Mercola and CHD. I have noticed– when one is focused on graphene, there is no critical thinking of known neurotoxins. An early chemical analysis of different brands and batches found various KNOWN toxins. In our current, absurd new electrical environment, the good ole’ poisons is all you need to become ill. Microwave radiation and mercury interact in known ways. Any theory that is not founded on this reality raises my suspicion. If any real epidemiology was happening, there would be studies looking at the ‘died suddenly’ (compared to living siblings) to document ongoing poisoning, like amalgams, root canals, metal implants, piercing, tattoos, wi-fi levels, RF levels, dirty electricity level running behind the wall where they sleep, etc. in addition to vaccine schedule. I am beginning to think all the poisons (while true and definitely neurotoxic) are not only used to control the population’s level of illness, but also used to engineer division among the population of the partial-awake. Where does it end? At this point, most of us who desire freedoms are arguing over details founded on wrong assumptions. To me, it is all beginning to look like layers of wrong. Thank you for the thought-provoking article.
We seem to be opposed by a scrum or mob or swarm without central control.
Thank you.
Whatu2019s your take on the internet of bodies?
https://rumble.com/v4s5egk-sun-coffee-and-the-biofield-they-continue-to-hide-from-you.html
Check out Sabrina Wallace and her info. It sounds crazy at first but given her past lived experience and all the receipts she provides on her Rumble and Odyssey channels, I have to believe her more than most others. She refuses to accept any money from anyone that receives her info. And she too does not believe most others in the u201CFreedom or Trutheru201D circles and movements. I look forward to your thoughts.
Thank you u2014 will watch this next uD83DuDC40
OK Beverly, I’m watching it. She says so many valuable things and she’s not lying — it’s all easy to fact-check.
Just posted my latest video: https://annmariemichaels.substack.com/p/injectable-electronics
I want to delve into the Sabrina Wallace stuff more on a future post. I know that what she is saying is true about the aura. Funny that “corona” means aura.
Hi Beverly, sadly i did not hear anything credible in her rant in that video so i can’t really comment on what she means by internet of bodies. Is there a particular segment or time you feel is credible.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.15.6
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_area_network
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_harvesting
I had a hard time understanding Sabrina Wallace videos since she has a very high IQ and itu2019s hard to follow what she is saying since she covers a lot and she goes very fast u2014 however, watching other people talk about her information is helpful u2014 like HopeGirl and Tevon, Todd Callender, Lisa McGee, now Dr Jane Ruby.
Hereu2019s one of many good videos from HopeGirlu2019s channel: https://rumble.com/v2zudz0-how-they-hook-up-human-bodies-to-the-internet-of-things.html
Ooh I didnu2019t know they had written a book u2014 Iu2019m going to order it and read it this weekend.
https://www.forbiddentech.website/
Hi Beverly and Ann-Marie,
I did a bunch of research today based on some of the links above. These are my preliminary notes.
First, the Body Area Network or BAN or WBAN (wireless version) is a real specification as noted by Ann-Marie’s reference to the IEEE wikipedia site. This is very similar to many other IEEE specifications for networks. However, although the network type exists in specification and there are a ton of academic papers written about it, outside of one experimental lab, I can’t find a single sensor or network device designed to use the standard.
If we ignore the details of the standard, it’s basically a low power short distrance communication protocol, which would require networking equipment designed specifically to talk to these devices to be in close proximity to the patient being monitored — since it’s designed to monitor health metrics. It shares the exact same frequency range as bluetooth and wifi so we can detect it with any of the standard RF meters we have today.
I suspect if you find videos alluding the BANs taking over people I think they’re probably trying to panic or deceive you.
I delved a little bit into the nano IOTs or Nano Internet of Things. Again, these are all very real concepts that have many papers and proposals written about them. This is pretty par for the course when it comes to technology. People like to propose grand ideas and then become the company to provide products to be sold. From my brief reading today, it seems the NIOT (Nano IOT) is simply IOT with nano sensors. This is where people get worked up, but I also looked up nano sensors. These are real things which are very tiny sensors that can detect interesting things at the molecular level, such as certain gases, or chemicals, or even virus’. However, these tiny little sensors are not capable of transmitting anything. They need to be connected to electronics — regular sized — in order to transmit the data. It is very much like handheld sensors today. You can get a thermostat sensor — handheld — where the sensor itself inside the device is a couple mm big. But it needs to be connected to power, and microchips in order to translate that sensor data into something you can either read on a display or can be transmitted via bluetooth or wifi to a computer. Otherwise the sensor is useless.
So this is what they seem to be talking about the nano sensors. You could plausibly implant nano sensors into someone’s body but it still needs to be connected to a transmitter so the data can be captured and reported. Not to different from pacemaker implants which are button sized, but have tiny little wires and probes that get placed near or on the heart. Same goes for the neural interfaces Elon Musk is experimenting with.
I have not seen any evidence of nano sized devices that can power and transmit bluetooth or any other signal.
Again, what I see in a lot of these videos is people taking proposals and standards, and then mixing the real terminology together in ways that either isn’t stated by the proposals, or is still conceptual.
Hi George, just found this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10006880/
And this: https://www.mdpi.com/2224-2708/11/4/67
Again, thank you for the links. Itu2019s all pretty overwhelming for my uneducated mind but I am fascinated by it all! And concerned for any nefarious ways such tech can be weaponized against us. Which is what I believe Sabrina is trying to warn us all about. She doesnu2019t seem to be profiting from any of what she communicates to those of us that watch her stuff. She seems genuinely intent on trying to help and warn us all. But perhaps Iu2019m naive. I just know my eyes have been opened quite a bit to the evil that exists in this world since the whole scamdemic and what the WEF has planned for us all.
Hi Beverly, see my comments above. It appears to be an area of active research. The research is focused on providing constant health monitoring for outpatients of hospitals so they can be continuously monitored when they are released for health problems.
As always, any technology can be used for good or nefarious purposes, but there is nothing in these papers that discusses control. It is for monitoring things like heart rates, blood pressure etc. Much like a pacemaker does today. (and the pacemakers support bluetooth).
Right now the WBAN appears to be a busy research topic, but they do not seem to have solved some of the problems, and they don’t seem to be anyone building hardware or software for it yet.
From my perspective, there are a lot more things that we know for certain that are happening today that we need to worry about.
They lied about chemtrails and geoengineering, too. Why wouldnu2019t they lie about this?
Anyone can certainly lie about anything for sure. But what is the lie here. I can’t find a single piece of hard evidence to suggest anything like being proposed is possible.
Powering nano sensors still requires power and electronic circuitry neither of which is even remotely injectable inside a syringe. All these papers you are bringing talk about the same problems.
Wrt to chemtrails the lie is one of omission. They are accomplishing sai through the use of dirty jet fuel and regular civilian flights of jet engines which happen to be outstanding cloud makers. Contrails are performing the work they outlined in their crazy papers a decade ago. But there is zero evidence of an actual program of spraying. Why would there be when the regular pollution does exactly what they want. The lie of cirrus contrails is that they are spraying us. I wish that was the case because it would be easy to stop. Instead we’re being poisoned by jet fuel pollution which is much harder to stop and i think they want us to keep talking about chemtrails because we are chasing phantoms while they keep polluting us.
There are planes that seed clouds through spraying but they fly into clouds at much lower altitutes and it isn’t secret or lied about. There are many non secret cloud seeding spraying programs for weather modification. But that is not chemtrails.
Your default should be to dismiss anything with to much complexity and unknown advanced tech as a psy op. These are everywhere.
Hi Anne-Marie,
This is an interesting academic paper as well, discussing a bunch of the WBAN proposals. The paper itself talks about the WBAN as something that is coming in the future, not in terms that it exists.
This paper is quite interesting, as it validates several of the key unsolved challenges that I have noted in the plausibility of injectable sensors and wireless devices, most notably, how to keep them powered, and how to transmit the data in a useful manner.
“Some of the problems facing wireless sensor networks such as limited bandwidth power, unreliable communications, and node vulnerabilities make QoS requirements essential.”
Both of these papers are entirely consistent with my initial observation, that the WBAN is still a theoretical and design construct. I have still have not found a single implementation of all these designs, let alone any manufacturers producing hardware of software required to implement it. It is clearly an active research area no doubt providing plenty of material for PHd and Masters theses.
Hi Anne-Marie, that is an interesting paper. It is a proposal of a system design for self-powering biosensors. A few notrable things:
1) It is an academic proposal, with extensive calculations on energy consumption to ensure their approach would generate enough power for sustained body monitoring. Nothing was actually built or tested. Academics write a lot of papers and proposals, most of which never sees reality. It would not surprise me if this was a masters or phd thesis paper for one of the authors.
2) The nano devices they discuss are all outside the body. They use kinetic energy from body movement to generate power. Even though they are using nano materials, they are not small and would not be injectable. They’re also PVC mats, not self assembling, and they are not Graphene Oxide.
It is also notable that they validate what I said above, that any data from WBAN still needs to be routed via the internet to be useful.
https://substack.com/profile/82541132-ann-marie-michaels/note/c-55794190
this is discernment
AMM, neither you nor I have the background to discern what is happening here, but I think George will weigh in.
your default should be to cry BS on anything you don’t understand unless you have substantial, credible evidence to the contrary.
I actually do have the background. Radio TV Film major with specialization in New Media, started my career in Silicon Valley in 1995. Been surrounded by nerds for decades so I do understand this stuff.
Great talk with George today! Thank you so much for taking the time today. Have fun on your trip, relax & enjoy, and we’ll chat again soon. Check out HopeGirl and Tevon, also Lisa McGee and Todd Callender.
Perhaps start here: https://rumble.com/v4skakk-exposing-the-forbidden-tech-secretly-controlling-mankind…-and-why-it-will.html
to understand this nonsense about the “internet of bodies” to be the psych op that it is, you need a technical background that neither you nor I have despite multiple advanced degrees. George thinks it’s idiocy. And I hope he weighs in here in detail.
Thank you for all the links. I was just watching a video with that couple in it. Iu2019m not sure if Sabrina knows them or not. She calls out many that donu2019t believe her in a few videos because she believes many are aware of the evil intended to destroy us all and that they are hiding it from us. Other synergists she recommends to those looking for direction and help. She claims Christianity and Jesus yet combines some interesting mystical things in her life. As with anyone I come across, I prayerfully take what resonates with me and reject the rest. I appreciate your insights too. Thank you.
Yes Sabrina knows them
please never cite the CIA (wiki) again here
I use those because it’s all mainstream now. You don’t have to dig for it.
yes you are right
Hi. I have been watching many of her videos over the last few months. Many are just too long and deep for my brain. But I have seen the many sources and done some general online searches about medical body area networks and many of the dots she connects seem to be legit. I am just curious what others have found when digging into the way we are being monitored and possibly controlled by these nanoparticles none of us ever agreed to having in our bodies. Yet there are many credible sources even govt documents and textbooks that discuss such things. Most of what is being sold to us as medical breakthroughs and such but given the encroaching abilities of AI and the future, I am extremely interested in how the WEF and WHO and powers that be intend to try and control all of us.
Agree one hundred percent on sources and how we should evaluate them. One of your better columns.
What is your objective?
how to see truth and falsehood, proper discernment
Good! Nevertheless, after reading your link from a guy vitually slaughtering methylene blue as toxic and a carcinogene, I can no longer see what is true or false about the stuff. I’ve read SO many convincing positive articles about MB and used it for two years, BUT NOW WHAT to do?
and MB should not be used when taking CDS/MMS1.
Not that it’s dangerous, it’s that MB neutralizes CDS/MMS for >24 hours (supposedly)
I am not using MB B C the blue drives me nuts. I am on CDS and DMSO which i describe in the next post. If you have references about CDS and MB interactions please post.
I will try to find. It was on Rumble. Some guy, been taking CDS for years and a ‘guru’ re: CDS, was ‘imploring’ people not to combine MB/CDS. Not dangerous, just that MB neutralized CDS for over 24 hours.
I just did a quick search of my folders and no luck. I’ll try to find by this weekend.
Also he and Dr Kalker (in his PDF which you and I have read) said not to take any antioxidant supplements while taking CDS/MMS. Especially MB.
“No antioxidant sups” = his words & the PDF of Dr Kalcker): no coffee, no tea, alcohol, nuts, seeds, milk, fruits, vegetables etc etc. It seemed inhuman to me. But these are not my words.
I’m not sure I believe antioxidants neutralize CDS 100%. Too lengthy to get into as to why I ‘believe’ this not to be true.
I have to go over the Ultimate Guide to chlorine dioxide again and speak to its author. Thanks for this contribution. The complexity here is overwhelming. If you are willing to chat, please reply to this post in the email and I’ll supply my phone number. I need to take Kalcker’s course.
I’ll also ask Kerri Rivera
would you post her responses here … or on one of your future substacks?
Just saw this reply – days late. Sorry. And yes it is complex.
The foods/supplements/meds a person cannot take while doing CDS is overwhelming. I got past it by only taking it 2 x per day….2 hours before any food (when waking up) and later in the day when I had a window of 2 hours no food/supplements/milk/coffee/tea/fruits/vegies/alcohol/nuts-seeds etc
I’d like to know more about your comments about MB (above or below this post). Interesting.
copy/paste below from the Curious Outlier’s PDF. Will try to find the info on MB/CDS. MB supposedly being the biggest neutralizer of CDS because it is one of the strongest and longest lasting (24 hours) antioxidants
PDF: The Ultimate Guide to Chlorine Dioxide
Page 143 u2013 145
Things that Neutralize the Potency of Chlorine Dioxide
u2022 Mineral supplements
u2022 Vitamin supplements
u2022 Time-Release Supplements
u2022 Alcohol, coffee & certain teas
u2022 Milk and all Dairy Products, Chocolate (Cacao), Coconut Juice,
u2022 Nuts, Fruits
u2022 Vegetables that are high in antioxidants
u2022 Juice with added vitamin-C or ascorbic acid
u2022 Any other foods high in antioxidants
u2022 Orange juice (and other strong citrus juices)
u2022 Hydrogen Gas and Water (Medicinal)
this guy slaughtering MB is a false flag/shill/lying POS
Yes. Strongly agree.
Thanks for your opinions, most interesting and believable. You say that you have researched HRT and that it is a positive thing but you didnu2019t define what type of HRT. I could more readily agree with you if you were only talking about bio-identical hormones but not if you were referring to synthetic analogue hormones. Iu2019ve had some negative experience with those both personally and professionally. I have trusted Mercola for 25 years and, like you, have been surprised at his pivots. From time to time over the years I have seen Mercola change his advice in light of new evidence and have viewed that as an indication of his honesty. However, I have never really believed in some of his more extreme recommendations and although he is only in his late 60s, a few years older than me, his appearance does not look healthy to me and Iu2019ve often wondered about that. From my point of view, the jury is out on Mercola and I will continue to read his stuff. I find it very hard to believe that, after all these years, the powers that be have finally managed to tame him. Time will tell I suppose.
excellent comments . I thought I referenced my book Hormone Secrets. For a free download see: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/p7dvqow83g
I have also been a long-time Mercola follower. I too became concerned after seeing a recent interview he did. But, my first thought was not of him being tamed, or “switching sides”, but of him maybe buckling a little beneath what must be a mountain of stress from the intense and constant scrutiny. I’m just ‘standing by’ for now…
Clues from cancel culture: What can’t be debated isn’t true; if debate of a subject is illegal, it is an obvious lie. u2014Alan Sabrosky
That is clearly nonsense given the sheer amount of media and social media cancellation and the rise of the paid fact checker to subdue those standing up against totalitarianism the last few years… Why would you have that as the end quote?
This means “what is forbidden to be debated isn’t true”
I agree with LMG. Example of what I believe their point was with the censoring and cancel culture.
*We can’t talk about the jabs being toxic, so jabs being toxic can’t be true??*
I’ve seen several doctors and scientists offer to debate about the toxicity and or “safety and effectiveness” of the jabs but they have been ZERO takers. The pro-jab people say they won’t lend credence to such a silly conspiracy theory.
Yesterdays issue, at least here, No debate needed. Noone in our room thinks it is anything but a genocide weapon.
For the graphene the most likely thing, besides the manufacturing defects, is simple fertility reduction. It’s been Bill Gate’s open agenda for his whole life, so why change now? Some additive that, in their studies, minimizes detection and lifestyle while making them more infertile.
AstraZeneca admits for first time in court documents its COVID vaccine can cause TTS
uFEFFhttps://nypost.com/2024/04/29/world-news/astrazeneca-cops-to-rare-deadly-side-effect-of-covid-jab-as-lawsuits-mount/
Since most of the sources are med. mags, sorting out what is rare or a statement to cover up the truth. AstraZeneca admits in court that its COVID vaccine can cause Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), Rare. Nothing is just rare when it comes to Jabs.
Default with manufacturers’ literature is to assume it is all a lie. I exhaustively reviewed this in Butchered by “Healthcare”. Free download: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/4kliod8a9z
Important stuff!
But too strident. Stridency sets off my spidey sense also.
Remember the rule of three. If someone lies to you once, it could be a mistake. Lies to you twice, it could still be a misunderstanding. Three times, you are dealing with a chronic liar. Proceed accordingly.
You are too generous.
And you are too stwict. 😉 Humans deserve a bit of slack. We all have feet of clay.
Here is another principle I have found useful:
Lust for certainty leads to self-deception.
The thing about the people I’m judging is they are sophisticated
I am thinking… you are among the highest performing humans out there. Sometimes you forget to cut some slack to the rest of us. Eh? 🙂
Too generous. Do not be overly impressed. I’m 70 and spent the past few years learning to write. My analyses are derivative.
I agree that deciding what’s true is our top priority. It’s important too, to separate information from the people providing it. Otherwise we risk blindly following everything someone says just because we trust them, as opposed to trusting ourselves to discern the truth.
No one is right 100% of the time. This is especially true in the health field where we’re inevitably sorting through research, reports, and expertise contaminated by special interests of various kinds. Being wrong doesn’t make someone a liar, though they certainly work among us. My research and experience often lead me to different conclusions than you express. Is one of us a liar? Not necessarily. But one of us definitely has better discernment or more direct relevant experience and both of us think we’re that one!
I follow all kinds of people. Some because I like to identify the controlled opposition and see what they’re putting out there. A distinct few because they have proven themselves adept researchers and truth tellers. They are always reader funded and have no connection to companies pushing health-care products of any kind, which makes for inevitable bias. But none of them are going to be right all the time because they’re human.
Contrary to what your pen name suggests, you have more bandwidth than me
What’s in a name? That which we call a bird’s brain would be a bird brain without the … ‘s
A sense of humor!
Or is it antipathy for apostrophe apostasy? uD83EuDD14
Show me. These posts go through paid Grammarly.
I was noting the difference between being bird brain and bird’s brain, with people ignoring the apostrophe.
“While this technology is usually publicly denied as having reached a high enough level of development sufficient for it to be deployed” — wrong, everything is published and public, and beliefs otherwise are akin to beliefs in magic. And did you really quote FAUCI right before making a claim about Mahalcea being “total evidence”? If I was reading a substack, I’d head for the exit and not let the door hit me in the a** on the way out. I analyzed M here: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/290-a-few-less-things-to-worry-about?utm_source=publication-search
Dr. Charles Lieber, Harvard chemistry chair, convicted felon (arrested Jan 2020) and very well-paid Chinese Communist Party asset with his own laboratory in Wuhan, called his invention “injectable electronics”: https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/injectable-electronics-unfold-to-monitor-brain-activity/8623.article
I posted this story about “injectable electronics” on my blog yesterday. Great minds! About to republish here on Substack. Just catching up on your post first. Listened on my way to pick up my son from school — love being able to read and drive.
As always, truly excellent writing, Robert. Not only is your work highly entertaining, it’s also very well thunk. Your contributions to the “100th monkey” evolution of consciousness are critical.
Here’s my post: https://annmariemichaels.substack.com/p/injectable-electronics
Hey thanks chat soon
Listening to psychopaths will confuse you. Their prose has exactly 50 percent chance of being true. Nothing this guy says is reliable so donu2019t quote him here.
Dude I only used one or two Eisenhower quotes. Misattributing this to affection is the sort of deception that can get you banned here. Don’t employ strategies like this again. Trump still seems superior to the alternatives. Alexander is a unique character that i judge by himself. I do not read him any more. Your judgments are different.
Can you provide a link to the fauci testimony where self replicating nanobots are in the covid accines please? That seems to be the only evidence you are referencing.
I have been paying much less attention to many writers and medical experts and especially the doomsters. Although my top source for many things is Armstrong Economics. I am tired of anything covid and never watch the TV news or read social media news.
Mercola temporarily banned me and one or two substack guys also. I don’t care. What I say is just my opinion and I don’t care who does or doesn’t agree. I believe certain things and am always looking for challenges to my thinking. I will say that Dr. Yoho is one of the few I trust and that list keeps dwindling.
Much of this echoes my thoughts. Once i flip my switch on an issue or a person, it’s too much to go back and miss all the torrent passing.
9 And this I pray, that your charity may more and more abound in knowledge, and in all understanding: 10 That you may approve the better things, that you may be sincere and without offence unto the day of Christ,
Phillipians 1: 9-10
https://www.drbo.org/chapter/57001.htm
Chaos agents abound, as you say. Discernment is a challenge but of immense importance. Too many people are happy to accept what is asserted by what they consider “their side” without using discernment. A better approach, if you are unable to discern for yourself, is to say “I’m not sure what to believe.”
Rather than completely ghosting people completely, I think it’s better to take “what you need and leave the rest” using your discernment skills as your guide. No ONE person is a complete expert in all facets (medical, financial, governmental, legal, big pharma, environmental, etc, etc) of what’s been attacked or manipulated in the last few years/decades/centuries. I do question people who seemingly turn tide to the “dark side” in mid-stream, as exhibited by our dear “Republican” Speaker of the House. He was taken into a SCIF and given, at least, a talking to before selling us out for another $100B for foreign proxy wars (with more “giving” planned for August, I hear) and NOTHING for the American people. Did MJ just change his mind after promising border funding was a hill to die on before any more funding went out of the US? Was he bribed, was his family threatened, was he threatened with “finding” child-porn on his computer? Reports are that he received a $4M campaign donation from AIPAC right before/after the vote. Then, there are others who can and have changed their thinking about vaccines and govt control (etc) just due to the happenings of the last 4 yrs because they realized that THEY had been lied to themselves for years. I also highly question people who claim to be “experts” or are put up as “experts” on several different, starkly contrasting subjects that have nothing to do with their true educational or career background. If you, a medical doctor, suddenly wrote an article advising me on legal property matters, I’m not sure I’d pay much heed without further investigation. I had a comment-exchange earlier today about this who-to-trust subject. They accused Sasha Latypova of being a liar and a level2 gatekeeper because she doesn’t believe in the “Internet of Bodies”, so on that point alone, he’s thrown out every other thing she’s said and done, along with Katherine Watt. I believe that’s completely short-sighted, even to the point of being willfully blind. Sasha doesn’t claim to be a networking expert (I’m not even sure I’ve heard her talk about that but she possibly has). I also question your heavy reliance on your ONE – “top engineer, George” although he’s probably more qualified to speak on these tech topics being a “software engineer” than the “assinine chemtrails”, where he was also put forth as an “expert” solely because he’s been a “airplane fanatic since childhood”. I still wonder what makes anonymous George considered to be a “top” engineer? Top in his company? Top in his city? Top in the country…the world? Top because you admire him? We donu2019t know and have no way to check besides your endorsement. This BT topic was lightly touched on back then, and I agreed with George about the BT signals – they simply don’t work like they’ve been presented by some. But I agree because I also have a background in IT hardware and software and corporate networking so I knew how these technologies worked prior to these claims being thrown out.
I think I remember correctly, the commenters on your article about “chemtrials are assinine” were not completely impressed nor convinced by George.uD83DuDE15 If we used your parameters of discernment as our guide, there’s many of us who would no longer be subscribed to your substack. uD83EuDD37u200Du2640uFE0F
Good points. I can see both sides. I also understand that ghosting is a survival strategy right now, particularly for “digital soldiers” on the front lines of the information war.
uD83DuDC4D to all points in your post. You’re hired.
I appreciate your seriousness and lengthy response. George is completely credible to me both for u201Cchemtrailu201D and for these issues. I’ll leave you to him
Trust me, bro.
🙂 you funny, honey.
1) Birdsu2019 brains are vastly underrated. While small, they have concentrated, high amounts of neurons. I learned a lot by watching crows, chickens, peafowl, and parrots.
2) Are you familiar with Geoff Pain, PhD, who writes from Australia on Substack? He is a biochemist and has done extensive work on fluoride harms in the past, and he now writes prolifically about the Covid shot harms. He says all of the phenomena being attributed to graphene can be explained by the endotoxin contaminants of the shots.
Sounds rational and George agrees. I just asked him and we are on a road trip together.
Pain has a couple of articles that I want to bring to your and Georgeu2019s attention on related topics, but I have to go find links. Safe travels.
One link, but not the exact one I searched for.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/edta-deaths-in-america
Yes and thanks for the link. EDTA sometimes causes fatalities for metal exposures. Great link
The only subject Iu2019ve been reading articles on the past few years is Covid and all things connected. Because I try to stay neutral on topics I donu2019t know enough about or havenu2019t researched thoroughly, ( like uD83DuDC7D aliens, Zionists, ancient advanced civilizations, 5G and 911), Iu2019ve lost friends and family.
Nobody can agree to disagree anymore.
Anyway, I appreciate your thinking and the interviews. Keep it up.
Warning warning warning – shuffling old information around is just as bad as peddling wrong – miss or disinformation – makes you look bad. What we ignore is more critical than what we read. Hmmm nobody talks about the WHO – international health regime – pathogen-profits benefit sharing NGOs … equitable access to pandemic related products. We ignore the bureaucracy of greed battling greed… the global pharmaceutical medical industrial complex and their “global health security” WHO Partners have tentacles in every country, local legislature/counties… all part of the pathogen benefit sharing totalitarians. They laugh at us for pointing our finger at everyone but them.
Good points all
…. your extinction rebellion indicator isn’t even registering doc.
What?
Thanks for your directness and clear thinking.
The LCQ position sounds schizophrenic. People with schizophrenic thinking and character structures are much more common than the 1% of people diagnosed schizophrenic. Schizophrenic characters tend to be quite sensitive to threats but often reach distorted conclusions about their feelings of being threatened. The word salad thinking, i.e. stringing together words that don’t make sense is a form of loosening of associations and a common symptom. Schizophrenics can be socially malignant but usually they are just delusional.
LCQ people are just scared and unsophisticated. It’s understandable w what we’ve been through.
The bottom line is the best part:
“Telling the truth to yourself and others is your highest value. You must ignore stories if they fail the above tests or are supported only by speculative or circumstantial evidence. If your spider sense activates, assume you are being lied to unless you have overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
Thank you ever so much Dr Yoho! I am so glad you have written about Mercola! A few days ago I left a comment on one of his articles essentially giving thanks to God for his awesome creation as opposed to evolution (the article asserted that trees had changed what they were doing in order to fatten up squirrels). I was banned for doing this without any right of reply or appeal. I had apparently breached ‘community guidelines’, and yet I was not provided any ‘community guidelines’, and I was not advised of exactly how I had breached! To say I was shocked is an understatement as I have been following Mercola for 10yrs+.
FYI – This was the email I was sent…
” For over a quarter of a century, this site has aimed to equip you with information to take charge of your health. We recognize, however, that not everyone has been able to apply this knowledge personally, often due to circumstances beyond their control or responsibility. Moving forward, our focus will shift towards providing content that empowers you to make informed decisions for fostering health and joy in your life. Our goal is to foster a supportive community where everyone can safely explore and learn these principles.
Regarding your recent contribution, it does not align with our site’s renewed focus, and as a result, you will be temporarily banned for one day. Should there be future posts from you that do not adhere to our guidelines, the duration of bans will increase progressively: a week for the next instance, followed by a month, three months, six months, and then a year. A violation after a one-year ban will lead to a permanent ban from the site. ”
I was aghast at the condescension of the first paragraph…apparently I have not spiritually arrived – perhaps through no fault of my own. Am I misinterpreting that?
Trawling through his previous posts I found the strange one in February 24 he had written about ‘refocusing’ and that he has decided that he wants to provide joy to people as a priority. This was the same article that advised his followers that articles would be no longer hidden behind a paywall.
I personally happen to think the elite filth out of the UN will eventually declare Sunday as earth day and decree that everyone must ‘worship’ nature on this day – get involved in the paganism, worship the beast type scenario like the Bible says. I had always been worried that the natural health crowd, the Mercolas of the world, who have onboarded so many spiritualistic practices, such as Flower essences for one example, would fall for this new-age lie.
After searching a bit I too found he has been consulting with spiritualists. In Christianity we call this witchcraft. The joy Mercola feels is the pride of life, not the reverence the living God, and nothing good can come of ghosting God, and setting yourself or Demons up as the ultimate authority. One of my first thoughts in all this was…but Dr Yoho loves Dr Mercola, as do many people. I am so glad you have called out his bad behaviour, and what a hero for the ghosting stance!
We canu2019t worry about those, like mercola, who fell in battle. All we have time for are these brief epitaphs.
Thank you! I am sorry for him, but he has allowed himself take the counsel of demons. Yes, we are all but a breath of wind. And we have a battle to fight.
u2764uFE0Fu2764uFE0F
The mighty donu2019t want the meek to inherit earth. They are farming us like livestock, making us weak and susceptible to death. What I find interesting is the high similarity between the actions of the elites and what the Sumerian tablets tell us about the actions of the gods who they claim walked amongst them. The similarity is astounding. They are copying the Sumerian gods in an awful lot of what they do
Sitting on the internet all day every day writing and reading about whatu2019s going on has got to stop. People seem to be trying to make a buck out of the situation rather than plan revolution. They are all hat and no cowboy.
Iu2019m glad you have seen mercola in a different light
Revolution is the only solution and if organised well can be quick and relatively painless for everyone. It would sure beat just talking about it anyway
We Are Being Farmed!
Growing up with fascism
A slave to the corporate state
those who donu2019t buy the illusion
For them theyu2019ve planned a special fate
From birth to euthanasia
We have a value to the state
Keep up your contribution
And you may get through unscathed
(Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State medias false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being farmed
We are being harmed
The useless eaters must be euthanised
For the well-being of us all
With smiles and hugs from academics
Your numbers written on the wall.
We must ignore the vaccine genocide
Autism, allergy and Sidu2019s
Pretend we donu2019t know what is causing them
Or theyll send around the pigs
Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State mediau2019s false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being farmed
We are being harmed
Some genetics they will target
A threat to the corporate purse
Those with inefficient detox genes
Evidence of events adverse
Theyre still practising eugenics
Itu2019s Designed into the state
If your genes are problematic
Predetermined is your fate
(Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State medias false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
We are being farmed
We must raise our arms
Thanks M
Cold and flu season will never be the same. The four things that you need daily to stay out of the system is clean water, whole organic foods, sunlight, and exercise. Stay healthy.
My grandmother used to say, u201Copinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and they all stink.u201D
Second and third opinions are always valuable.
FROM A READER VIA EMAIL:
I have really enjoyed most of your emails, but when you begin belittling other peopleu2019s contributions and bad mouthing them you really make yourself look bad, and I wonder if I shouldnu2019t cancel you. Itu2019s not okay to do that. I would not say that you have correct discernment.
(Name redacted)
I replied: The Freedom Movement is filled with shills and false flags paid or influenced by our enemies. I will soon post an interview with Mathew Crawford to confirm this. He is at roundingtheworld.substack.com if you want a preview. Itu2019s a painful insight, an unfortunate black pill. Being Pollyanna about it helps no-one.
Best and thanks for your contribution, even if it turns out to be the last one. If you return, please always post in the comments so everyone can see your ideas.
Robert Yoho, MD
Another good one, the mere affirmation of my thought/opinions of the mass amount questionable info helps me so much and brightens my week – your fingers on so many diverse u201Cexpertsu201D makes you my go to substacker to slosh through this shit show clown world, a tad happier and secure in my discernment. It again, is truly comforting to find a much needed big brother from another mother. You are very much appreciated for all that you do and Thanks. Safe travels but more importantly have tons of fun!
touching comment
always cry bullshit rather than adopting the latest thing
Today Substacker Unbecoming had an interview with Timothy winey-absolutely fascinating. Hoping an interview with you to bring it down to levels of understanding of his theories/experiments of hydrophobicity, etc.
I scanned the article about methlyene blue being toxic, and the blogger also posted articles about supplements containing toxins…It sounds so real. How can I…a nonscientist…know what is true?
His aim is to discredit people we know are true blue. Look at it again and read my MB post. He’s a liar and a shill.
I actually did take a look at it, and that is why I wrote the comment I did. It continually amazes me how people like him spend so much time writing about such topics that concern people enough to second-guess themselves and their own knowledge. I just do not understand it. What does he get out of it all? Is he paid to do this? Does he do it simply for the thrill of it? Cui bono?
Unfortunately the “zapper” you mention doesn’t work as advertised (check the responses on it’s page).
One could be made, but it’s going to require a lot more current and more robust construction. You’ll want to consult with an electrical engineer familiar with EM radiation.
Also, Radio Shack has been out of business for years.
I date myself.
Thanks for the update. I was reporting what was told to me by LQC
NP all my pencils need erasers too
Personally ‘Doctor,’ I don’t ghost anyone. I try to read from all sides. Discernment is a gift, for sure. Gut instincts are from the gut, for sure. Itu2019s all so deep. Stay safe. Stay healthy. Second opinions are valuable. IMHO; clean water, organic, whole, nutrient dense foods, sunlight and exercise are a must, daily. Prevention is key to it all.
For 25 years, when I discharge patients from my care, I always tell them to ‘drink plenty of water, eat your vegetables, go to church on Sunday, wear your seatbelt, take your vitamins, exercise vigorously, keep your hands washed, and stay away from loose women.’