Yoho: This is a repost of original content authored by OPENVAET from his Substack HERE, and it speaks for itself. I did an exhaustive AI fact check, running many pages, on the first post just below, and it was carefully referenced and allegedly accurate. Everything in this post except this italicized section was copied from the original. If you have the same feelings reading this as I do, consider cross-posting it.
On March 30, 2026, we published “William Makis: The Truth Behind A Disgraced Doctor Turned Online Predator” – a long-form investigation into the disciplinary record, legal history, and behavioral pattern of a man who had reinvented himself as a leading voice in the medical freedom movement. The article documented findings of sexual harassment, a zoophilia admission on disciplinary record, a vexatious-litigant designation, and a cancelled medical licence, alongside testimony from former colleagues and patients.
Makis never addressed any of it seriously.
Instead, over the following two weeks, he reproduced – almost item for item – the behavioral pattern the article had described from his Alberta period: mass escalation, attacks on former allies, attacks on the nurses who had originally testified against him, DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) directed at anyone who asked questions, grandiose threats, mass blocking, and systematic deletion of evidence. In total, he deleted at least 21 X posts and an entire Substack article.1 The key difference was that this time the archiving infrastructure was already running. Every deleted post, every tampered screenshot, every threatening DM was captured.
What the record makes clear is that Makis does not belong to “any side” of the vaccines argument, or of the cancers treatments arguments. He is not pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine. He is not a cancer expert, a medical freedom advocate, or anyone’s ally. He is a man who manipulates whatever system he inhabits – an oncology department for the short time he had one, a online movement when he found one – and who turns on anyone who exposes him, rejects him, or simply stops being useful. The targets change; the mechanism does not. He rode the institutional system in Alberta until it ejected him; he is now riding the online ecosystem, where the boundaries are far wider and the consequences far slower to arrive.
By April 14, Makis had publicly alienated, among dozens of others, Kelly DNP, Jikkyleaks, A Midwestern Doctor, Kevin McKernan, and Dr. Jessica Rose – five of the most respected names in his space – while discarding supporters who had personally referred patients to him. Even Scott Adams, then dying and now dead, was not spared. It’s almost impossible for an external observer to track the nuances of Makis’s reactions, so what follows is the day-by-day record.
March 30 – Article Publication & First Supports
The article went live at 02:02 on March 30. By 13:43, Kelly DNP, a prominent voice with over 166,000 followers, had publicly shared the announcement tweet, tagging Makis and inviting him to comment on the veracity of the elements advanced.2 Rather than address any of the documented facts, Makis immediately took to private channels. Within two hours, he was messaging Kevin McKernan on X, calling Lyndsey House “a saboteur” and warning him to “watch your back – keep your eyes open.”3
The framing was familiar: the article was not an investigation to be answered, but an attack to be blamed on someone else. By 15:38, he had blocked Kelly – the first person who had publicly asked him to respond to the record.4 While our thread on X was spreading in vaccine skeptic ranks, LA, the Albertan lady who helped us with the first article, released it in the provaccine ranks.5
March 31 – Makis’s containment efforts backfiring
On March 31, as the article continued to circulate, several prominent accounts in the medical freedom space shared it publicly – Annelise Bocquet and David Cartland, for example. Fynnderella and Jikkyleaks, who had stayed out of the conflict, were nonetheless unfollowed and blocked by Makis.
One of the most striking testimonies came from Kathryn, a PhD researcher with over 40,000 followers, who had first been blocked by Makis in early 2023 after objecting to his habit of attributing every publicly reported death to the COVID shots. She later described stumbling upon a public conversation in which Makis was misleading a family whose relative had cancer into believing his protocol had a perfect success rate. When Kathryn asked for proof – blood work, PET scans, imaging – Makis temporarily unblocked her, claimed all his patients had documentation on file, then refused to produce any of it and blocked her again. She stressed that promoting a treatment as 100% effective in curing cancer was irresponsible and dangerous, and urged anyone misled by these claims to file complaints with the Florida State Medical Board.6
April 1st, 2 & 3 – Makis escalates while rare allies attempt damage control
On April 1, we began reaching out directly to Makis’s significant past supporters, while we unearthed the 2025 “conflict” between Makis and A Midwestern Doctor – a major figure in the medical freedom space with a Substack readership dwarfing his own – demonstrating that the pattern of burning former allies and branding them pharmaceutical assets was nothing new in the COVID space for Makis.7
On April 2, Dr Kathryn announced publicly that her husband, himself a physician, after reading the article, intended to write to the Florida State Medical Board.8Unexpectedly, Brianna Ladapo, the Florida Surgeon General’s wife, blocked our X account after we politely brought the article to her attention.9 Dorit Reiss, a prominent provaccine advocate, discussed the article.10
Then, late that evening, Makis launched a Substack broadside against A Midwestern Doctor, again branding her “a Big Pharma asset” and “controlled opposition” because, last year, she had expressed concern that these alternative products were being presented as highly effective solo therapies rather than valuable additions to an integrative cancer protocol.11 Makis simply truncated the date out of the screen, making it look like he was reacting to a post made the same day.
On April 3, Sasha Latypova publicly rallied to Makis’s defense.12 We replied directly, noting the irony of championing a man with documented sexual harassment findings and a zoophilia admission on record, and who had never previously used ivermectin in cancer treatment – his actual clinical work at the Cross Cancer Institute had involved Lutetium-177, a costly palliative cancer therapy Makis instead portrayed as life-saving.13 Dr. Mark Trozzi also weighed in with a defense of Makis, listing his peer-reviewed publication history as evidence that the man deserved a platform regardless of the allegations. Numerous published case reports of partial responses to Lutetium-177 or a legitimate early career does not, of course, immunize anyone against findings of sexual harassment, a zoophilia admission, a vexatious-litigant designation, and a cancelled medical licence – none of which Trozzi thought to address.14
A Midwestern Doctor responded to Latypova’s defense publicly.15
April 4 – First Saturday Meltdown
April 4 was the day Makis did the most damage to himself, firing in every direction over the course of roughly fourteen hours in what can only be described as a public meltdown.
It began at 02:03, when he posted an attack on Jikky, declaring he was “done in the freedom movement” and accusing “his team of harassing the Florida Surgeon General’s wife” – none of which of course was true.16 By mid-morning he had turned on Lyndsey House and LA, accusing the latter of belonging to “a cancer patient killing team” and implying she would be shortly dying of her Type 1 diabetes.17
Minutes later, he was targeting Sarah Rayner again – one of the nurses he had sexually harassed a decade earlier and whom he still blames for testifying against him and producing pages of evidence. He posted photographs of her, alleged that she had filed fake complaints to secure a bigger office,18 and accused Sandy McEwan of embezzling more than $100,000 in cancer research funds and of having an affair with Marguerite Weiler, another witness to his professional misconduct.19
Makis posting photos of colleagues from a decade ago eating
He replied directly to our account with various provocative messages,20 moved on to threaten a X user, vaccine injured, called Melissa,21 then told Mary Talley Bowden MD that Lyndsey House was a pharmaceutical infiltrator sent to damage McCairn and McKernan.22 He showed shortly after his contempt for vaccine injured individuals, implying that “spike protein to the brain has done more damage than she knows”.23 By the afternoon he had posted yet more photographs of Rayner, this time accusing her of conspiring to “murder cancer patients” for an office upgrade,24 25 launched a gratuitous attack on “Polly St. George” ( who had no involvement whatsoever in the story – having me blocked for two years,26 semi-threatened Charles Rixey and Kevin McCairn,27 and attempted to deflect the conversation onto Scott Adams being dead following the treatment administered by Patrick Soon-Shiong.28 At 16:13 he began quietly untagging himself from our threads.
At 16:40 he published a lengthy rant on Substack against Jikkyleaks & myself (along with Alex Berenson and A Midwestern Doctor), deleted it five minutes later – but not before Henjin had archived it.29
The article was a masterpiece of duplicity – cutting screenshots to make it appear as though Jikkyleaks had been responding to a different post than the one he was actually replying to, among other tricks. Unfortunately for Makis, it also contained too many indicators for his readers to find our article – and it generated a wave of subscriptions to our Substack, along with some embarrassing questions in his comments. He deleted it five minutes after publishing, making it the shortest-lived Substack article I have ever heard of.
Every single one of these posts on X, he subsequently deleted as well. Every single one had been archived. The reader will note that this is not a new pattern. It is the Alberta pattern – mass escalation, attacks on every available target, self-victimization, and hasty destruction of the evidence – reproduced in real time, a decade later, on a public platform, in front of the very audience he depends on for income.
April 5-8 – Aftermath
In the days following the meltdown, the consequences began to materialize. A Midwestern Doctor publicly recounted that Makis had “barraged her with threatening DMs” and that she had recognized the behavior from prior dealings with similar men.30 More damaging still, Sasha Latypova – who only four days earlier had publicly defended Makis – replied to A Midwestern Doctor, thanked her for the explanation, apologized for the misunderstanding, and disengaged. Latypova had been one of Makis’s most prominent remaining allies in the medical freedom space.31
Makis attempted to regain credibility by associating himself with a new ivermectin preprint from the Wellness Company – but readers quickly noticed it cited a paper of his that had been retracted for undisclosed conflicts of interest. By April 8, he was issuing threats again, warning Dr. Jessica Rose to “be EXTREMELY careful who you choose to help” and adding that “some of the so-called vaccine injured will do everything to take you down”32 – a veiled threat directed at one of the most respected biostatisticians in the space. He also turned on Kelly, accusing her of being “abusive.”33 He ended his April 8 remarks by suggesting, in a paranoid-sounding public warning to Dr. Jessica Rose, that prominent vaccine-injured critics had faked their diagnosis.34
April 9-10 – Collapse Of Makis’s Networks
On April 9, Makis blocked Kevin McKernan35 – a genomics researcher whose DNA contamination findings in the mRNA vaccines had made him one of the most credible and widely cited scientists in the movement. McKernan had been observing Makis’s behavior with growing unease since the article’s publication. In strategic terms, blocking him was an act of self-destruction: McKernan’s scientific standing dwarfs Makis’s own.
He was not the only one to push back. Dr. Jessica Rose responded publicly to the threat Makis had directed at her the previous day, making clear she would not be intimidated.36 Typhaine Pinsolle called Makis out openly,37 as did Le Collectif.38Peter Gillooly, the Wellness Company’s CEO – whose company Makis had been courting while simultaneously disparaging it – publicly distanced himself from Makis’s conduct.39
On April 10, we published a second thread documenting Makis’s deleted pro-vaccine posts from late 2021, showing him actively pushing boosters only weeks before his pivot to “medical freedom” activism.40 The thread reached over 71,000 views and was shared by several other prominent accounts.
What followed was a cascade of firsthand testimony. McKernan, drawing on fifteen years of quality control in the cannabis industry and his sequencing of the first cannabis genome, recounted watching Makis redirect immunocompromised cancer patients toward a CBD provider with no legitimate lab testing – a company that hosted Makis’s unverifiable “patient testimonies” on its product pages, suggestive of a financial arrangement. Makis vehemently denied this conduct after which McKernan provided video evidence to the contrary.41 Any critique, McKernan said, was met with accusations of belonging to a shadowy anti-Makis cabal. He described the dynamic bluntly as “pure cult behavior,” noting that Makis’s documented record had never been addressed – only met with insults, blocks, and claims of victimhood.42
Jikkyleaks stated he was “disgusted” by Makis’s conduct since the article – in particular the decision to blame everyone around the author, including people uninvolved, and to send what he called “defamatory and predatory DMs” to mutual contacts. He supported right-to-try access to repurposed drugs for cancer, he said, but not behind paywalls and secret protocols.43 Hank Rearden, an MD-PhD who had spent the previous days defending Makis, reported that Makis had blocked him too – despite years of support and having personally referred stage-4 cancer patients to his protocols.44
Makis’s response was to post more screenshots of his anti-vaccine activity, ignoring the fact – documented in the original article – that he had been posting pro- and anti-vaccine content simultaneously during that period, deleting whichever side no longer served his narrative.45 He fell back on his preferred register: his critics were “paid accounts” whose goal was to “sabotage the care for hundreds of thousands of cancer patients.”464748
Shortly afterward, our X account was unexpectedly flagged with a “visibility limited” label and placed under restriction.
April 11 – Second Meltdown and Tampered Screenshot
April 11 was a second fourteen-hour spiral.
The day opened with Makis dismissing Typhaine Pinsolle – telling the researcher she could “cry as much as she liked” – while inflating his claims to new heights: 9,000 cancer patients already helped, 5,000 on a waitlist, a Florida clinic that would be “the largest in the world,” and clinical trials and patents “already being written.”49 He then turned on McKernan with sustained venom, calling him “a pathological liar,”50 “a gutless coward and spineless freak,”51 and suggesting he might have suffered a stroke or brain tumor – “did you end up taking a Pfizer jab or two after all?”52 This led into a lengthy monologue recasting Scott Adams’s death from cancer as a murder committed by mainstream oncology, with Makis positioning himself as the only person who had tried to help. The rant cycled through every stage of Adams’s illness, each punctuated by the same rhetorical question: “did that appall you?”53 As for the article and those sharing it, the explanation was the usual one: “Always follow the money. They’re getting paid.”54
That same day, Makis published a Substack article also branding McKernan and Rose as pharmaceutical industry agents, accusing Rose of “condoning the harassment of the Florida Surgeon General and his wife,” and declaring all of his critics “BANNED FOR LIFE” from his Florida cancer clinics – and any event he would be involved in.55
The article contained another of Makis’s damaging mistakes. He had included a screenshot of McKernan’s post – but had removed three paragraphs from it. The removed section was precisely the passage directing readers to the primary source material documenting Makis’s history.56
A side-by-side comparison of the archived original, which had accumulated over 20,000 views on X, with the version presented to his Substack subscribers confirmed the tampering instantly. When readers began noting the discrepancy in the comments, Makis started deleting their remarks.57
The rest of the Substack piece recast the Scott Adams case entirely in Makis’s favor – portraying Adams as an ungrateful patient who had quit after one month and attacked him publicly, and his death as a murder by mainstream oncology.
On X, the barrage continued. Between 09:45 and 12:21, Makis attacked former Alberta colleagues McEwan and Weiler again,58 declared that “none can take me down,”59 addressed us directly with increasingly agitated posts,606162 and claimed that McKernan “had a stroke”63 – a post he deleted thirty minutes later. Andrew Zywiec published a lengthy defense of Makis, but Makis was too busy fighting on every front to let anyone else carry it.64
Then the private channels went public. At 11:08, McKernan published his DM exchanges with Makis, exposing the tone of the behind-the-scenes pressure campaign.65
Makis responded within minutes – “You’ve completely lost your mind”66 – followed by a mock-concerned post urging people to “get Kevin the help he needs.”67
He then pivoted to yet another lengthy post about Scott Adams,68 before turning on Lyndsey House again, accusing her of having “allied herself with cancer patient murderers who harassed the surgeon general’s family.”69
At 13:33, McKernan returned with receipts and had his block lifted long enough to crush Makis’s arguments.70 Melchizedek, another X user, also published threatening DMs from Makis.71 And in the comments section of Makis’s own Substack article, a patient reported that he had sent money to Makis days earlier and had heard nothing back – a small detail, but one that spoke directly to the pattern described by numerous doctors of Makis leaving his patients without serious follow-up.72
April 12 – More DMs Go Public
Makis opened the day at 03:32 by telling a commenter named Kim to “get mental help”73 – a phrase he recycled almost verbatim for another user, Muhumaa, hours later.74 The insult-as-diagnosis was becoming a tic.
The more significant development came from the other side. McKernan published direct testimony from Scott Adams on Makis’s conduct that nullified most of Makis’s deflection. Watching the full exchange, starting at the twenty-three-minute mark, is worthwhile; but for the purpose of this narrative, the extract below addresses Makis’s preferred claim that Adams “only took it for one month.”75
Makis responded with what amounted to a formal excommunication76 – declaring McKernan’s reputation dead, pronouncing him “unstable, unethical and caught lying repeatedly,”77 and announcing his intention to take him to court78 – adding to a litigation record an Alberta judge had once described as “metastatic.”
He launched fresh attacks on LA,79 then turned on Charles Rixey – a decorated former Marine and biodefense analyst – for the offense of having politely defended Lyndsey House. Makis declared that Rixey “stands with Satan,”80mocked him for having taken the COVID shots,81 and attacked him across multiple posts.82
Makis Attacking LA & Rixey
Meanwhile, the testimony kept arriving. At 08:34, Janice Tiessen published a firsthand account describing Makis’s mishandling of patients.83
The most consequential moment came at 10:56, when Dr. Jessica Rose published the threatening DMs Makis had also sent her84 – making public the private intimidation that had until then been only rumored.
April 13-14 – The Isolation Hardens
By the final days of the period, the pattern had become self-sustaining. Dr. Jack Kruse publicly expressed full confidence in McKernan,85 reinforcing his standing in the space. An X user, Kristina, published a detailed critique of Makis’s conduct and claims.86 McKernan continued dismantling Makis’s positions in an exchange with Dr. Henry Ealy.87 Amy Kelly, a prominent figure in the vaccine safety documentation effort, publicly called attention to the damning evidence against Makis.88
Makis, for his part, addressed us directly once more, claiming that our article had “ruined a claim for Sarah Rayner”89 – an assertion that, if true, would amount to an admission that the claim existed to begin with. He closed the period with another attack on LA90 – by now obviously a reflex rather than a strategy.
April 15 – The Sarah Rayner Obsession
The final day of this record brought another disturbing episode: a sustained, hours-long fixation on Sarah Rayner – one of the nurses whose testimony about his documented misconduct had contributed to his downfall in Alberta more than a decade earlier.
After we published a thread highlighting his latest behavior, Makis responded not by addressing the documented record, but by pivoting entirely to Rayner. Between 02:31 and 03:18, he posted a rapid succession of messages – at least five separate posts – all centered on the claim that Rayner was entitled to “$1-2 million in compensation” for having been coerced into filing complaints against him by AHS executives Rob MacEwan and Matt Parliament, and that our article had somehow destroyed her chance of collecting it.91 92 93 94
Makis’s insane rants on Sarah Rayner
The posts were remarkable for several reasons. First, the implicit admission: if Rayner had a compensation claim arising from the complaint process, it would confirm the complaints and the institutional response they triggered were real – precisely the record Makis had spent two weeks trying to discredit. Second, the grandiosity: in the 03:12 and 03:18 posts, he listed over a dozen individuals he claimed to have personally elevated to wealth and power – Marguerite Weiler earning a million dollars, Don Cranston becoming President of the Law Society of Alberta, Verna Yiu becoming Vice President of the University of Alberta, Brenda Hemmelgarn made Dean, Ritu Kular made Chief Justice, Paul Belzil made Judge – a list so expansive it included at least fifteen names, all allegedly owing their careers to him. He closed with the claim that he had “made at least 20 new millionaires.”
By 04:43, he had escalated further – posting a photograph of Rayner, identifying her as “a daughter of a famous Alberta Physician,” disclosing that she had been 23 years old and one year out of nursing school at the time of the events, and sharing details about her entry into “one of the biggest cancer groups in North America.” The post was accompanied by the claim that “many cancer patients died” as a result of her actions (presumably due to reduced access to palliativeLutetium-177) and that AHS had spent over $10 million in legal fees on the fallout.95 Six minutes later, at 04:45, he posted again another photograph alongside a narrative offering two competing versions of Rayner’s involvement – one portraying her as a victim of executives, the other as a mastermind – while dangling the existence of “a $1-2 million reward waiting for her in a legal loophole that’s about to close.”96
More of Makis’s creepy obsession on Rayner
A woman who had testified against him over a decade ago is being publicly identified, photographed, and discussed in terms designed to create maximum pressure – financial incentives, closing deadlines, and implied threats – all broadcast to his audience in real time. Whether intended as manipulation or intimidation, the effect is the same, and Makis’s conduct is reprehensible.
At 04:50, as if nothing had happened, Makis switched tone entirely – replying to the World Council for Health’s announcement of a Kevin McKernan conference in May with a falsely cheerful “I’m very much looking forward to this one!” followed by a winking emoji.97 The juxtaposition was jarring: an hours-long campaign targeting a former colleague, immediately followed by a casual public signal that he intended to show up at an event featuring one of the people who had just publicly denounced him.
By morning, the attacks had returned to familiar targets. At 09:22, he was targeting LA again – the Albertan woman who had helped source material for our original article – calling her “a stalker and severely mentally ill,” accusing her of faking a Type 1 diabetes diagnosis “to milk money on GoFundMe,” and declaring that “she needs to be sectioned and put in a psych ward.” The claim that a woman injured by COVID was fabricating her condition for donations simply because she had dared to call him out, coming from a man who had built his public persona on manufactured stories, required no commentary.98
At 11:02, a Czech user shared our article in Czech-language circles. Makis’s response was to call the author “a Czech pedo defending Canadian pedos” – a baseless smear deployed reflexively against anyone who amplified the documented record.99 Minutes later, at 11:19, he responded to another critic with a five-word “rebuttal”: “The people are with me.”100
At 11:43, he turned to Dorit Rubinstein Reiss – a law professor known for her work on vaccine policy – posting her photograph receiving a vaccine and labeling her “a vaccine addict,” adding: “Drug addiction is very serious.”101 The post was directed at the same user he had been sparring with throughout the day, and it carried the same signature: a personal photograph, a fabricated diagnosis, and a public insult.
The day’s final documented exchange came at 12:15, in a reply to Kelly DNP – the prominent voice who had first shared our article on March 30 and been blocked for it. Makis declared there was “no time to waste on people who abuse cancer patients or keep the company of people who abuse cancer patients,” before pivoting to his frequently used declaration of war: “There is a WAR on Cancer patients and many in the freedom movement are willingly destroying their careers and reputations to stand with people who want to hurt as many cancer patients as they can.”102
Sixteen days after the article went live, every documented fact remained unaddressed. The list of people attacked by Makis now includes nurses, researchers, genomicists, law professors, vaccine-injured advocates, and anonymous social media users across at least three languages. The archiving infrastructure continued to run. Every post was captured. And the pattern the original article described – escalation, DARVO, deletion, isolation – was performed for a different audience, with the same outcome.
Let’s be plain about what this record contains. A man confronted with documented findings of sexual harassment, zoophilia, a cancelled medical licence, and a vexatious-litigant designation responded by publicly targeting the nurses who had testified against him a decade earlier, posting their photographs, fabricating diagnoses for vaccine-injured women who criticized him, threatening researchers, tampering with screenshots, and declaring half the medical freedom movement “BANNED FOR LIFE” from clinics he may or may not actually operate. He did all of this in sixteen days, in public, online. The only thing that changed is that this time, people are watching.
It would be difficult to design a worse crisis-management strategy if you tried.
We consider the record complete – or at least complete enough. Between the original investigation and this chronicle, anyone who wants to evaluate Makis’s conduct now has what they need: archived posts, timestamped screenshots, leaked DMs, firsthand testimony, and a day-by-day trail of deletions that only makes sense if he understood exactly how this behavior would appear once preserved. We are not asking anyone to take our word for it. We are asking them to read.
Going forward, our active work shifts to something more useful than documenting the obvious: legal support for Makis’s victims. The nurses he harassed, the patients he abandoned or defamed, and the individuals whose medical conditions he publicly mocked – most of them have carried the cost of his behavior in silence for years, because until recently there was no consolidated record to point to. Now there is. The archiving infrastructure stays on, because Makis has shown no sign of stopping. But our efforts will go where they matter most.
X post ids & archive: 2040218706261750233, 2040329848153948598, 2040333442366267897, 2040343061440409774, 2040335457993535651, 2040337202278695208, 2040357466815307781, 2040409676295135519, 2040410537561928002, 2040416438721085687, 2040424959655268818, 2042890784454709655, 2043140221986889986, 2043214443492892773, 2043148167462437306, 2043148441715368425, 2043219507699716327, 2043153091839525274, 2043196544766157045, 2043196811901378750, 2043197584483786897
Please put me back on your block list.
I’m truly just confused. I asked him to clarify a post few days ago and was blocked. I have no ill will towards him but blocking when asking for clarity is not the way.
The truth lies in years of records of misconduct and those scourged by @MakisMedicine.
A disturbing pattern of pathological deviant behavior- including zoophilia— for which there is no place in society.
When he got to
You have all the elements on his sexual harassment & bestiality here ⤵️
blog.openvaet.info/p/william-maki…
.
openvaet.info/p/william-maki…
H/T @BornFree_isms @LazarusLong13
Correlating Metabolic Activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT With Histopathologic Characteristics of Osseous and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas (2012) – American Journal of
She has recently joined vicious attacks on terminally ill Cancer patients who are exercising their “Right to Try” with Ivermectin.
I suspect she intends to do damage to both @KevinMcCairnPhD as well as @Kevin_McKernan
I like @Kevin_McKernan and @KevinMcCairnPhD, if they were sabotaged and I didn’t say anything, I’d feel quite guilty
I really don’t want to have to say “I told you so” down the road.
Be EXTREMELY careful who you choose to help.
Some of the so called “vaccine injured” will do everything to take you down.
I always found his public spat with Scott Adam’s to be a violation of patient-physician privacy.
Something a real doctor would never engage in.
I’m not a physician but having worked in a CLIA setting, this is communication that the patient controls.
I don’t think the Japanese jurisdiction changes that.
Combining fenbendazole and mebendazole is generally not recommended on a consistent basis due to the increased risk of liver stress and
L’homme était un promoteur de vaccins jusqu’à fin 2021. Il a perdu son emploi en 2016 pour harcèlement sexuel de ses infirmières. S’est vanté de sa zoophilie. Il n’est pas agréé. Et il a détourné des millions à l’argent public.
Veuillez lire
Please read how much he has lied to you – everything comes with receipts ⤵️
https://t.co/TXESjvIMr6
All while cashing in $75K a month.
The damage is real: from families I know personally to countless testimonies online.
For Makis, accountability is long overdue.
Accusing other people of lying when they have receipts is libel.
This you Mr. Makis?
I stopped engaging with Makis when I witnessed him push patients toward CBD providers I’ve never heard of
Up until late 2021, he was pushing boosters. Then suddenly, his tune changed.
Here are some of the posts he deleted.
🧵
He then started sending defamatory and predatory DMs to our friends. I had actually tried to keep out of it until then.
Their goal is to sabotage the care for hundreds of thousands of Cancer patients.
Only problem is they’re too late.
The Clinics are already being built.
We have over 9000 Cancer patients we have already helped and 5000 on waitlist.
Our Florida Cancer Clinic will be the largest in the world
There are Clinical Trials and Patents already being written.
Your childish attacks are not going to stop
You’ve just raised red flags on all your “work”.
I hope someone threw you a few extra dollars for this, seems like everyone is getting paid for this kind of filth these days…
Hope you got yours and hope it was worth
CBD Oil is available on every corner in Canada.
If you’re going to bad mouth OLEY or Lee Whitley have the guts to say their names, you gutless coward and spineless freak.
I have NEVER re-directed anyone away from a “20 year
We all saw him unravel publicly and we all saw him ultimately murdered in slow motion by mainstream Oncology.
Tell us exactly what “appalled you”.
Was is that I tried to help him in
There are people who would benefit from there being no FLORIDA IVERMECTIN CANCER CLINIC
just as there are people who would benefit from there being no Ivermectin Cancer Clinical Trials sponsored by Governor Desantis.
The bad news
So pathetic 😂
makisw.substack.com/p/big-pharma-w…
https://makisw.substack.com/p/big-pharma-war-on-cancer-patients/comment/241897339
the 85% response rate wasn’t published as the Clinical Trial was sabotaged by AHS Executives before the data could be published.
Principal Investigator and AHS Director of
We worked with the big OGs in Europe like Bad Berka and Erasmus in Netherlands. They created the field.
But I had a good run with it for a few years and our program was North America’s finest…
Look, the
I’m just disappointed so many “good names” are throwing themselves into the fire. For nothing.
There was no cause or need for this.
Betting against me is a losing strategy.
Your silly shtick isn’t working…
CBD Oil is available on every corner in Canada.
If you’re going to bad mouth OLEY or Lee Whitley have the guts to say their names, you gutless coward and spineless freak.
I have NEVER re-directed anyone away from a “20 year
Please put me back on your block list.
The doctors who pushed him into taking multiple COVID-19 injections Scott didn’t need
The incompetent Oncologist who talked him out of trying repurposed drugs
The Kaiser Oncologists who withheld
I suggest going to a church….only God can heal you.
SG Lapado should be informed.
He even slid into my DN’s before blocking me…🤷🏻♂️
https://makisw.substack.com/p/big-pharma-war-on-cancer-patients/comment/241705197
Your question should be reversed.
Did Mr Makis, after stating clearly in that video that I had more experience in this field than he had, contact me about those details after he redirected people to his affiliates?
He is putting these drugs I. Jeopardy by doing what he is. He claims too much, he doesn’t follow his patients adequately. He blocks his
Makis blocked me and went on the offensive for what appears to be me not taking any side on an article about him as I just don’t have time to stay current with X drama.
The video above happened over 6 months ago and I only aired it
Up until late 2021, he was pushing boosters. Then suddenly, his tune changed.
Here are some of the posts he deleted.
🧵
Because if she ever finds out you ruined any chance she had of getting compensated $1-$2 million, I think she will
She is severely ill, needs to be admitted to a hospital for psych evaluation
That’s cruel and unusual. Sarah can still access the $1-2 million but doesn’t know how. I do.
But someone
She has been cruelly treated by this “group” who ruined or blocked her access to proper compensation. She is the only one who hasn’t collected
She has been cruelly treated by this “group” who ruined or blocked her access to proper legal compensation.
She is the only one who
There is a WAR on Cancer patients and many in the freedom movement are willingly destroying their careers and reputations to stand with people who want to hurt
Subscribe to OpenVAET’s Substack
Launched 3 years ago
Main interests in data analytics focused on clinical-trial integrity and demographic trends. Occasionally focusing on combating censorship and disinformation surrounding COVID‑19.
This is shocking!
Not shocking… some have been saying this for a while… glad he is being exposed.
Look at this from Scott Adams…. just this past Dec 2025…. https://gigaohm.bio/@StellaMaris/posts/B5Mijlvrhv8MOjECf2
unfortunately S Adams went shopping after hours at the wrong mall
Wow . Thanks for the link. ( & Mr.Adams , rip)
Very interesting. And come to think of it. I donu2019t know of any verifiable sources that the protocols work. My brother is taking both ivermectin and Fenbendazole. He has a tumor in his colon. Not cancer yet. I donu2019t know if itu2019s helping.
Nope… that’s what I thought at the beginning…. that’s what he wants you to believe… I was a big fan and rallied for him and shared his work everywhere….for no reason he blocked me,…. I reached out to him by email and asked why and if there had been a mistake.. he said that yes, I was blocked and no reason why… I am no pharma shill…. he is the fraud….. check the video below….
It ought to be a given that anyone who blocks for any reason ought to be considered a pariah. There may be a very rare reason to block someone say for spamming, etc, but first a dialogue must go on between the two, not just the censor and give their reasoning. If people don’t stick by this principle, then expect to be treated like a bunch of chimps forever. Free speech is worth standing for – it’s the only tool we have against psychopaths.
he is not a fraud because he blocked you, he is a fraud because of fraudulent actions and activities Be a fan of no one. Stand alongside those who have earned trust with actions, deeds, knowledge.
I was not saying he was a fraud because he blocked me…. I was trying to show that he also blocked me along with many others and even when I contacted him for clarification he pretty much laughed and said “yup, you’re still blocked!”….
thanks for the clarification, correction taken
None the less, he was the wrong choice…
why does anyone even care?
Dr. Yoho is NOT a Big Pharma shill. Read his published books.
Fenben and other protocols he used are also not as effective as traditional remedies like Essiac tea, paired with other protocols.
not sure how you might so opine, have been in these trenches for many decades
very aware of the best protocol to include the Gerson Therapy
Surround the Dragon approach often useful in advanced scenarios.
Plenty of opportunity to correct course before then.
Do you know that from experience? Fenben stopped my BF’s fast growing tumor in it’s tracks. Although the credit goes to Joe Tippens.
Thats a long litany of u201Cstuffu201D. would you be kind enough to do one similar on Fauci?
He has been thoroughly discredited for a very very long time.
Still required health illiterate followers. Who is that on???
A great deal has already been said about Fauci, and he was not, in this case, the most immediate threat to the credibility of safety advocates through a narrative built on falsehoods.
That said, I do intend to address a pro-vaccine figure next, so that no one can accuse me of partiality.
Just read RFK, Jrs book.
I canu2019t believe you posted this crap. I am so SICK of people attacking those who are exposing corruption, fighting against Big Pharma and the monsters who are getting wealthy exploiting and killing patients. He is one of the few still standing after outrageous attacks and attempts to silence him. He is still trying to get lifesaving treatments to the public while fighting against many corrupt agencies. You should be on the same side. You are falling for the crap that pits us against each other. Shame on you. Iu2019m unsubscribing.
Exactly! Why they’re attacking Dr. Makis is because they’re Big pHarma shills…
I can say with confidence that my Substack contains far more materially damaging information for pharmaceutical interests than Mr. Makisu2019s does.
For example, the work my colleagues and I did on Pfizer/BioNTech corruption has become a reference point on the subject:
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/pfizerbiontech-c4591001-trial-audit
Apart from exploiting u201Cdied suddenlyu201D cases, Mr. Makis has done very little of substance.
So could you please show the basis on which you are asserting that I am a u201CBig Pharma shillu201D simply because I am calling out a fraud?
Don’t be so fast. Maybe you should look into it further. If he blocks people, as a commenter mentioned above, (not that I’ve checked it out) then he’s not on the right team. Team Nazi is the team who blocks others.
I’m capable of making mistakes, but some people are capable of being a pain in the ass.
good riddance?
Could you please be more specific as to which information you believe is not sufficiently sourced?
Until the end of 2021, Mr. Makis expressed support for the vaccine in a substantial number of his threads, and later deleted those posts. As the 21 X posts linked in footnote 1 above illustrate, deleting posts that may later reflect poorly on him appears to be a recurring habit.
It is understandable that many people assume anyone opposing the government must be on the right side, especially after the abuses witnessed during COVID. But for some individuals, this is not a sacrifice; it is a very profitable business. Before the pandemic, Mr. Makis was an unlicensed and disgraced radiologist. Today, he reportedly earns $75,000 per month from Substack alone.
Meanwhile, he places behind a paywall treatments whose effectiveness he appears to significantly overstate, and he blocks users over even minor criticism.
I would encourage you to examine the evidence closely before reaching a conclusion.
How do you know he gets $75k/month from Substack? Thatu2019s absolutely insane! And, on another note, I didnu2019t read this post. I thought Dr Yoho wrote it and couldnu2019t understand why he was blathering on about Dr Makis. Now that I know he didnu2019t write it, I feel like the post would have been much better if you would have been more succinct and given us the cliff notes and a hyperlink if we wanted the scoop. I donu2019t have time for this debate. I wish both of you well.
B. This is important enough to scan.
Hello Butterfly,
I know that he has a $7.5 monthly fee on 10,000+ subscribers thanks to his purple badge.
https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/10661509585428-What-is-a-Substack-Bestseller-badge
It’s more a minimum, as he passed this 10K margin around a year ago. His strategy forcing you to pay to access any data related to his protocols is very efficient to have a very high rate of paid subscribers.
Thx for info!
After his out of the blue attack on Midwestern Doc we thought something must be up with Makis!
Particularly when one observes that, in the case of Midwestern Doc, Mr. Makis once again appears to be rewriting history – claiming that Midwestern Doc attacked him in direct messages when in fact the opposite seems to be true, and that he himself was the one persistently on the attack simply because the effectiveness of his methods had been politely questioned.
Agreed
Reminds me of Dr. Maloneu2019s dispute with the Breggins.
I am not interested in hearing your or AMDu2019s petty arguments against Dr. Makis. I donu2019t care what he did or did not do 10 or 20 years ago. Why do you bring this to the public? What do you expect us to do? If I or a loved one gets cancer, Dr. Makis is the first doctor I am going to call. He has the blessings of Gov. DeSantis and the Florida Surgeon General to open a clinic in Florida to treat patients and perform studies on these medications that are needed so doctors do not have to be afraid of losing their jobs for using them. Does not that mean something? Currently, I hold no hope for any kind of treatment working to cure cancer other than these repurposed drugs. I have lost 4 friends to cancer in the last 2 years and now have a relative who has cancer. I told all of them about Dr. Makis and the success he is having with repurposed drugs and they all chose or are choosing mainstream cancer care. The friends are now dead and the relative is responding poorly to radiation and immune therapy and her prognosis is poor. Please, stop this stupid in-fighting and work together to find a cure for cancer. Find proof – do studies that prove these repurposed meds work to kill cancer so it can be approved by the FDA and these treatments are available to all.
I am the author of the article, and Dr. Yoho was kind enough to share it with his readers.
To answer your first question, I chose to make this public because I believe people should be informed when they are placing their health in someoneu2019s hands, particularly where that individual has a highly questionable reputation and appears to have a pattern of misrepresenting facts and evidence.
Mr. Makis charges substantial sums for u201Chealth coachingu201D sessions. His method is aptly summarized by Scott Adams: there is always said to be something the patient has done incorrectly, which is then used to explain why the promised results have not materialized. Meanwhile, he publicizes numerous success stories that are neither verified nor verifiable, despite the fact that testimonies from individuals who say they were harmed by him are not difficult to find.
I hope this helps clarify why I believed it was important to bring this matter to public attention.
As for the second part of your message, Mr. Makis does not appear to be licensed to practice in Florida either, as may be verified on the following portal:
https://mqa-internet.doh.state.fl.us/mqasearchservices/healthcareproviders
He appears to overstate the extent of his progress toward authorization to practice there, and it seems he did not represent his situation fully and accurately to the Surgeon General.
FYI u2013 if you actually knew what you were talking about, you would realize that Scott Adams did not follow the protocol that Dr. Makis laid out. He instead went to Dr.s that gave him medication that wouldu2019ve never done anything to put his cancer in remission, and eventually, it cost him his life.
For your information, had you read the article you are commenting on, you would have seen that it includes Scott Adamsu2019s direct testimony, which refutes the “Makis’s version of events” you are currently presenting.
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/the-unraveling-of-william-makis
Could you please address my question as to which part of the introduction you consider inaccurate before posting further inaccuracies in the comments section?
This is the first time I have ever heard any thing bad about Dr. Makis. I read a lot of the post article and I find it confusing. At this point I still stand with Dr. Makis.
Hello Jackelyn,
You may find it helpful to read the article that prompted these past two weeks of discussion. It provides important background on how Mr. Makis lost his licence, and the account it documents differs significantly from the one he appears to have presented to you: https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
I appreciate that it can be hard to consider the possibility that someone you trusted may not have been truthful with you. However, in this instance, Mr. Makis appears to present himself as part of the genuine safety-advocacy community while showing a troubling disregard for factual accuracy.
Yeah. Im on the fence about this. What Makis did was monetize the Joe Tippens protocol. And now he sells overpriced ivermectin and fenbendazole. He did this after Alberta took away his license for treating COVID patients with ivermectin. His livelihood was taken away from him and he found a way to replace his income. I dont know anything about his distant past but see he is definitely an opportunist. Nevertheless, fenben and ivermectin do work to treat several cancers. I’ll need to think on this new info.
I am sorry, but could you point me to a source for the claim that Mr. Makis treated COVID patients with ivermectin?
He has not been licensed since 2019, so I am skeptical that this actually took place. That said, given his apparent pattern of misrepresentation, it is entirely possible that he made such a claim at some point.
As I noted in my original coverage of Mr. Makis – which led to the two weeks of events described in the article above – the issue here is not, in itself, alternative or complementary cancer treatments. Rather, it is the conduct of a flawed individual who appears to oversell unproven anecdotes and to blur or distort the factual record.
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
I dont have a horse in this race but clearly you do as you are responding to every commentor who is applying discernment. I have a friend who the protocol worked for. I have the freedom to form my own opinions.
Since this is my article, which Dr. Yoho was kind enough to repost, it is only natural that I would respond to comments I can address.
Please refer to the introduction above.
As I explained in the introduction to my first article on Mr. Makisu2019s long history of falsehoods, the issue here is not u201Ctreatmentsu201D. I strongly encourage research into alternative cancer treatments.
I fully understand it’s your article. I said what I said.
I simply asked for a source for your statement.
Anyway, have a pleasant day !
Amen! I lost my husband to all of the traditional cancer treatments and I went through BS cancer surgery myself. Never again. Going up against the cancer mafia is enough to make anyone crazy. Give Dr Makis grace.
I have followed Dr Makis since he did the interview with Del Bigtree on turbo cancers early in the plandemic. He said it was the vaccines all along! He has always been against the vaccines. His poor family has been through heck and back for his treatments. The Canadian government has been relentless. Hellou2026. Weu2019re not stupid. Are you getting money for this? How childish and shameful. You should be happy he is saving thousands of people who have been left to suffer and die by big pharma.
I just found your substack and was learning some great treatments but I am really shocked you would go to this length to smear a fellow doctor who has endured horrible persecution. What a great welcome to the US.
I am unsubscribed.
One more thing, you will confuse a lot of people and deter them from treatment by posts such as this.
I believe people can decide for themselves what to believe or consider.
Hello Margo,
I do not believe you have a fully accurate picture of the events that led to Dr. Makis losing his position in 2016, including findings concerning sexual harassment involving nurses, as well as other misconduct. I addressed these matters in my article here:
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
I am sorry if Dr. Yohou2019s decision to share my article has led you to stop reading him. Nevertheless, I hope that, in time and after an objective review of the facts, you may reconsider.
This is the first time I have ever heard any thing bad about Dr. Makis. I read a lot of the post article and I find it confusing. At this point I still stand with Dr. Makis.
Perhaps it would help if you read, for context, the article that led to the present situation: https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
I gave Mr. Makis an opportunity to comment 24 hours before publishing the article, and to this day he still has not answered the very simple question I put to him: can he prove that Sarah Rayner recanted her testimony, as he claimed in writing that she had?
Big pHarma must be euphoric over all of this infighting. It detracts from the goal of finding more tolerable and less expensive treatments with fewer side effects.
Best comment here so far!
I do not think Big Pharma would be euphoric at the prospect of safety advocates u201Ccleaning houseu201D and removing frauds from their ranks – quite the opposite. I believe Mr. Makis rose to prominence meteoricly despite providing very poor evidence to support his claims, especially compared with many others who have been far more useful to the cause of truth.
Wouldnu2019t you agree that cancer patients should be warned if they are placing their health in the hands of someone who appears to rewrite history as a matter of habit?
I do agree with your last statement but I stand by my comment.
I appreciate that, but you will understand that I stand by every statement made in my two articles on Mr. Makis.
Do you understand that, if I was able to find this information concerning his sexual harassment of nurses and other unacceptable practices in public records and in documents that Mr. Makis himself had hosted online in 2020, then pharmaceutical interests would also have had access to it?
And would have been perfectly pleased to see him reach 650,000 followers on X and earn more than $75,000 per month on Substack, while knowing that, if he ever attained a truly credible position, they could control him at any time.
You are correct and I do understand what youu2019re writing. But I still believe this entire situation makes Big pHarma very happy.
Yes. This entire thing breaks my heart.
Donu2019t want to get in the middle of this one!!
Exhausting read, at only 1/3 point. What an Egofest.
Regarding vaxs lets employ a mathmatical tool called the least common denonimator,
shall we? Health does not, nor could it, come from needles. That is the course from beginning to end. The details?
More and more about less and less is a race to the bottom. Studies, data, Big P incentives,
ridiculous indoctrination campaigns have very little merit. Philosophy of health for the win.
By training Medical Doctors do not study health or its causation.
The brightest bulbs in the room got whatever information they have attained
elsewhere. Several other Doctorate degrees do study health, directly. Look there
Or take the counsel of Renegades while learning how to unravel the combination of
components that cause the Dx. Far better to prevent problems, most of which are avoidable.
The fact that clueless people are on the receiving end of fools is whose issue? One is well advised to shop at the biz with the desired goods.
Egofest competitions require a lineup of competent players. The matches are boring
and a waste of time.
Latypova has a short fuse and a filthy mouth in her private communications. However that fits into this drama, is irrelevant. She and a Psychotherapist, Sansone, suffer from tertiary Derangement Syndrome.
They are on the right side of the ban mRNA campaign. So.
Apparently, diarrhea of the mouth dis-ease is not hers alone. Onward.
Thanks, DY. Lots of arrows coming at ya between this one and the marijuana one. You and sweet Judy may need to hide out at our Texas ranch – 3 hots and cot anytime. Lol. I am very glad to hear u sound and look so much better than about 2-3 weeks ago. As always enjoy your cut on everything and agree nearly 100%. Sidebar- u may already know but (as u mentioned) Parkinsonu2019s causing constipation – well genuine essiac tea – we have found with doing keto – takes care of that – if u havenu2019t looked into it – give it a shot genuineessiac.com Bryan Paulhaus. Keep getting better and kiss your sweet supportive wife. Stay low and keep your powder dry!
Thanks, I’m starting a thiamine program that may help me a great deal. I will post about it soon.
Which drug company do you work for?
Can you be specific as per which information isn’t sufficiently sourced ? In this case most of them are coming directly from Makis’s own X account.
His “They’re all in on it” rants sound like they’re meth-induced.
Energy weapons from big pharma to discredit his new venture ? or , well people in all economic brackets are on that poison. Hope not.
I took his word for why he had problems in Canada ,he u201Cforgot u201Cto mention a lot of important details .
I subscribed to his substack for a while, but the only thing free subscribers can read are his rants. Anything that might be useful is paywalled.
What a document! Great job putting it all together.
As a journalist who has written about safe, cheap drugs like ivermectin for cancer, and the need for choices outside the toxic chemotherapy menu, I thank Dr. Yoho for his courage.
Good to know Mary Beth Pfeiffer.
Viliam, please do not make veiled threats to people in the comments section; it is not a good look.
Could you now provide the evidence that Sarah Rayner recanted her testimony, as you claimed and as you have been asked to do numerous times?
What treat did Villiam make?
u201CVeiledu201D threats.
What do you understand by u201CGood to know, Mary Beth Pfeifferu201D when Mary Beth is thanking Dr. Yoho for having had the courage to share an article highly critical of him, and when that man has a documented history of intimidating witnesses?
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
Do you not think he could comment directly on the article – for example, to explain why he wrote in his letter to Minister Shandro that a key witness had recanted her testimony against him, when in fact she had not ?
Most revealing article. My only response is that Iu2019m glad I sat back and watched Dr Makisu2019s work over the past few years and never recommended him to anyone I knew battling cancer. And itu2019s a good reminder to question everything and everyone even if they are claiming they are on the side of truth and justice.
This is so disheartening.
I’m not up to speed on any of this. So if I’m reading the post correctly, people are making big money either by gaining subscribers on paying platforms using subjects like cancer. Or are they charging people looking for ways to treat their cancers? Is this an opportunist taking advantage of suffering people with cancer or a fake expert using a paid platform?
Can anyone simplify the post. Thanks in advance.
The story deserves a quick scan.
What is the advantage for a system with a track record of harm in forcing you to choose between DMSO and anti-parasitic drugs?
Because either way, you stay trapped — divided, distracted, and steered toward potentially harmful substances, keeping the cycle intact.
I won’t fukkin choose cause I won’t fukkin trust !!
It’s not easy, but you need to make judgments.
This whole back and forth is so slimy and unprofessional. It makes me sick and less likely to trust anyone at all!
Thank you, Dr. Yoho.
First, for taking the time to review the evidence; and second, for being courageous enough to share this with your readers, while clearly knowing the backlash it would provoke.
It is a rare quality to be able to look beyond tribal allegiance and speak the truth even when it is uncomfortable. I am confident that those of your readers who take the time to assess the situation with a neutral eye will recognize the courage that required.
Take care, and please do not hesitate to send me a direct message if any technical assistance might be useful in your work.
Heu2019s still getting $7.00 a month from us after canceling the payment about a year ago. It is still being put on our credit card. Substack avowed any evidence of him and our payment. Will complain to our credit card and have him removed.
I have followed Dr. Makis for a while and saved his testimonials. For me, the bottom line is this: are Fenbendazole, Mebendazole and Ivermectin effective at healing serious cases of cancer. At least are they better than Pharma treatment. That is all I care about. As a previous comment stated, we are all losing people to cancer. If his protocols are working, itu2019s the only issue for me. So my question is, are they effective and at what rate u2026 10%, 50%, 80% ?
I wish I would have read this before I paid for my subscription with Makis last week.
I want my money back.
If you start a dispute, you can claw your money back.
I have had people gang up on me too, it is so nice to be in the in-group and not cancelled, I think.
Even Kevin McCairn’s friend said I had mental health problems, Kevin agreed. Kevin said I didn’t have the right jargon so I injured his vaccine injured patients. I don’t need the jargon because I am not communicating to only clinicians. My Substack posts are select bibliographies. Not my work. I don’t need jargon. I copied and pasted the work of specialists. Then he pinched my “Spike Protein Injury” term and a couple of screenshots, while he was getting his boots in and wanting me to be obsolete.
I am not a market competitor (ie snake oil salesman) so I was shocked to be attacked like that.
And just because he doesn’t know about nanotechnology he said there is none in the covid injections and rejected the transhuman thesis. Well he can reject it, I’m not force feeding anyone. Or undermining anyone. Or making wild claims that CJD can be cured if I pay the snake oil salesman.
I’m simply collating lists of things I have read the last few years, for others to regard as part of the puzzle, or not.
Then someone else, omg, she slags off everyone, is confrontational to the point of being abusive to those who know less than her or more than her, depending on the subject. She said this video that Tucker Carlson presented should not be taken seriously.
rant over.
https://rumble.com/v27cjlo-tucker-carlson-this-is-a-remarkable-deal-for-drug-companies.html
You are allowed to rant.
I’m practicing my prose. 🙂 I adore you Dr Yoho, you are awesome!
From the one Kevin McCairn debate I saw, he himself has mental health problems (or at least character problems), and his behaviour (including the inappropriate video playing in the background) totally turned me off anything he has to say, ever.
Ah, so he might be projecting.
I have thrown my entire self into my Substack select-bibliography, so for Kevin and his friend to tell me to walk away from Substack because I don’t have the jargon just really upset me.
Thank you!
Forget what he says – write his name and complaint on a bit of paper, reject it, then burn the paper. He has no business giving anyone advice about communication.
I’m so glad you said that. Thank you. I hope I don’t cause an inferno!
zoophilia?? Dogs ?
I conclude the poop has hit the fan.. and shit all over the repurposed group , only people left with white coats are those concocting the next vaccine rollout.
It is rich that Yoho is slandering Makis for “sexual harassment allegations” when Yoho harassed me online with nasty misogynistic statements! The fact that Yoho follows anonymous abusers and a well known women abuser Sam Saidi, aka Jikky aka Arkmedic and other nasty trolls who smear, harass, attack women, go after children of those who stand up and fight back, and endlessly grift from total bullshit just tells you anything you need to know about this low IQ charlatan.
I remember you, I unsubscribed from your trash cause you have TDS!
u201Cnasty misogynistic statements!u201D u2026 thatu2019s so rich, you are such a victim, girlu2026.
Hi Sasha,
Why do you continue trying to dox people while simultaneously presenting yourself as the victim?
I am therefore obliged to refer readers to this biographical article on a Pfizer-made multimillionaire: https://www.openvaet.info/p/the-disastrous-alexandra-sasha-latypova
When do you intend to take part in the debate you challenged me to, and how is your effort to have Bill Gates arrested in the Netherlands progressing?
I followed Sasha like the Dead Heads followed the Grateful Dead for several years, until I made a comment on one of her posts that resulted in me finding out about her potty mouth. Sasha, it’s wonderful to hear from you, even if it’s negative.
Oh dear! I had no idea. Many thanks for the heads-up, Dr Yoho.
I paid a number of “expert” Dr’s on YouTube considerly more than I paid Dr. Makis. I have had Dr’s on social media who I respect and like charge 1,000’s of dollars for health Coaching and counseling on diets with no proof of outcome or value. Having 24/7 access to someone by email is not worth $5000, but that is what I have been quoted. Let us decide where we want to spend our money. Dr. Makis was $650, with dosage and good sources where to buy but no obligation to buy anything. Maybe he id making money off the Compounding Pharmacy he recommends in Florida but everyone has the option where to buy.
Dr. Thomas Seyfried Boston College PHD 40 year cancer researcher is the Dr. I watch and believe because he does the research unlike Oncologists that just sell drugs. Dr. Seyfried does recommend antiparasitics as well, all of them. Maybe you should look him up and read his research on diet, exercise, antiparasitics and Hbot. Maybe small doses of chemo but what Oncologist does not follow SOC and overdose the patient on chemo.
And, the great bifurcation continues. Those who are sentient empathic embodied souls, separated from the self interested entities using good as a proxy.
As far as the Ivermectin protocol, riddle me this. Why was it touted as an alternative to the vaccine for Covid injuries, by the tier one mainstream gatekeepers, just as thousands were refusing the jab? Why does the SDS/MSDS sheet give it a rating of acute toxicity, fatal if swallowed depending on concentration? Why does the Fisher SDS sheet say harmful to pregnancy? Infertility sounds like something the eugenicists love. Crossing the blood brain barrier sounds dangerous. Redistribution of released toxins throughout the body, causing the liver and kidneys to work overtime, doesn’t sound good.
Sure, there’s anecdotal evidence, and experiential evidence that people feel better, but I want to talk to these people 5 years from now. Tell me how you feel then. And, with the snake pit of narcissists who put the Wellness Company together and started pimping their contagion kit, that pretty much sealed it for me. I’m staying far away from Ivermectin, and anyone, doctors such as Makis and McCullough, and journalists (you know who you are) who get compensation from TWC to pimp their products.
The great bifurcation is underwy. Time for everyone to come clean. Either you’re on team humanity, or your not. Can’t support evil for a paycheck anymore. Get out and get clean.
I take no joy in this, but I felt like it had to be done. Truth should be our most important value, and my duty to warn is absolute. That is what I am doing here after all.
How does discrediting Makis who is recommending effective treatments to cancer, including fenben on which you ran a very positive article 2 weeks ago, help the cause?
Because these treatments do not need Mr. Makisu2019s discredit, his stream of unverified anecdotes, or his paywalls in order to demonstrate their effectiveness.
Mr. Makis has not authored any of the foundational literature in this field.
I asked Dr. Yoho. Allow him to respond please.
Unfortunately, itu2019s not wise to post articles like this, when you have NO idea of the validity of the content and what the authors motivation is, contrary to what they may project.
I agreeu2026truth should be our most important value, but it is imperative that we know the origins of that u201Ctruthu201D to the absolute best of our ability, using discernment before we even think to repost, especially something like that.
Since the source for every claim I make is provided, Dr. Yoho is in an excellent position, I would think, to assess the validity of the content, especially as he states in his introduction that he verified many of the sources with AI assistance.
So if you agree that truth should be our most important value, why not answer the question I have now asked you multiple times: which specific claim do you believe is insufficiently sourced?
Just remember, AI is full of medical misinformation. It calls a lot of the atrocities that happened during the Covid lockdown misinformation or hoax. It probably still denies hospital murder protocols. I cannot imagine that AI would actually confirm that the treatment in hospitals during Covid was often murderous.
Indeed, we should always be cautious and verify what AI says independently.
In this case, however, although I may be biased as the author, I am confident that the footnotes are accurate, as I selected them carefully myself and without any AI assistance. Do you have in mind any source which wasn’t satisfyingly proving the assertion made?
This article is nothing more than the character assassination of a good doctor who is doing good work. It makes me how you could even publish this trash? Dr. Makis is a threat to the cancer industry and the traditional medical world – and they are working to take him down.
Shame on you for publishing this crap.
I am concerned at his defensive online behavior, as a physician I think we expect more decorum; however, I donu2019t see any actual evidence of the accusations (sexual harassment, etc.) being lobbed at him posted here either. Was he convicted of any of these alleged actions? We know of quite a few physicians discredited over the covid/vaccine debacle. It seems there is a lot of defensive behavior here coming from multiple sides and egos.
u201CI take no joy in this, butu2026u201D I donu2019t believe you. Plus, that article was 100% AI LLM assisted. Give me it in 500 words or less and then let me decide. Annoying.
Thank you Robert. I could see things were getting a bit weird as time went on and this month things were clearly going haywire with WM. A bad sign. Of course from the sidelines we can’t see everything that’s happening behind the scenes. You’re not the sort to enjoy writing this piece but the layout of the goings on is most helpful.
He was highly toxic to me and all I had said is we need several options for treating cancer and that ivermectin Fenben didnu2019t save my uncle. His reaction led me to believe heu2019s a nut case. And then he blocked me lol.
Same testimony from anyone who ever asked him a mildly challenging question !
Or even from people who were supporting him, when he is in a bad mood…
What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. This a deeply upsetting development. There is too much at stake in the Medical Freedom Movement and this kind of pathological behavior only gives more ammo to detractors. Not to mention the genuine clinical research by MDs like Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, a retired (from Sloan Kettering no less) surgeon and oncologist who was initiating a small clinical trial involving Ivermectin. I’d been a staunch advocate of Makis’ and followed his interviews on the Shannon Joy Show, which showed no hint of any issues with his veracity and integrity. It’s so demoralizing to find out that someone you held in high regard has such a dark and twisted side. I hope this doesn’t set back genuine clinical trials that could prove IVM and Fenbendazol’s utility and efficacy in treating cancer–even if only as an adjunct to more traditional –or combined with other safe natural –therapies.
I understand the sense of disappointment this reading inspires you. It is deeply unsettling to discover that someone you respected may not have been truthful. But it is still healthier, in the long run, for fraudulent figures to be exposed and for patients to be properly informed – especially when so much is at stake for both vulnerable people and the credibility of genuine research.
Dr. Makis is a fraud. I knew it immediately after I reached out to him concerning a loved one with a brain tumor last year: u201C
Hello,
You can get a head start by reading Dr.Makisu2019 articles and testimonials on Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on his substack at makismd.substack.com
Due to overwhelming demand, Dr.Makis is also now offering Cancer Consultations. The following Cancer Coaching Session is currently available:
$500USD (or $685CAD) – Initial comprehensive consultation
Full review of medical history and cancer diagnosis
Answer questions about cancer diagnosis by email
A Repurposed Drug Protocol is provided within 7 days with suggested doses & sources
Follow-up and coaching for first 3 months is provided via email
$300USD – Follow-up consultation
if youu2019ve had an initial consultation with Dr.Makis already
re-assessment of medical history and cancer diagnosis
Additional Alternative Cancer Treatment approaches as needed
Sessions can also be booked for:
Neurological (MS, ALS, Parkinsonu2019s) including NEURO COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries
Autoimmune including COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries
Payments can be made by E-transfer or Paypal to: [email protected]. Checks / money orders are also accepted (5970 Mullen Way, #36560, Edmonton, AB, T6R0T4, Canada)
Please sign and return the attached Consent form. Once payment and consent form are received, you will be asked to provide pertinent medical history and the session will begin.
Thank you,
Julia, Volunteer Assistant for Dr.Makisu201D
Do you know other Doctors who work for free?
Far out, this guy sounds like a freakin nightmare! Thanks for the writeup.
Dr. Yoho,
Knowing this was a repost doesnu2019t really soften the impactu2014it actually raises a different concern: you chose to amplify it.
This piece reads as a calculated takedown, not a balanced or intellectually honest critique. And while you didnu2019t write it, you endorsed it by giving it your platform and your audience. That decision carries weight.
What makes this especially hard to reconcile is your own professional history. You built your career in plastic surgeryu2014a field centered largely on elective, appearance-driven interventions. Thereu2019s nothing inherently wrong with that, but it does make it difficult to understand why you would elevate an attack on someone working with patients facing serious, often life-threatening conditions, especially when those patients feel helped.
There are many who could dissect your career in a similarly unflattering way if they chose to. But thatu2019s not the standard I expected from you. What drew me to your work was your willingness to question dominant systemsu2014not to reinforce them by amplifying content that dismisses people operating outside of them.
This article reflects an enormous amount of effort to make a point that ultimately doesnu2019t landu2014at least not for me, and not for my family.
Because my reality is this:
My mother was given four months to live. Seventeen months later, she is still hereu2014without u201Cgold standardu201D interventions, without pain, without symptoms. That outcome may not fit neatly into conventional narratives, but it is real. And it matters more than any argument made in that piece.
From where I stand, the person being targeted is helping people when other avenues have failedu2014and doing so in a way that is accessible, not exploitative.
Whatu2019s most disappointing isnu2019t disagreementu2014itu2019s the choice to amplify something that feels aligned with the same forces that routinely dismiss, undermine, and attempt to discredit those trying to help outside the system.
You didnu2019t just share an articleu2014you lent it credibility.
Thatu2019s why Iu2019m unsubscribing.
Not because I canu2019t handle opposing views, but because this felt like a departure from the independent thinking that made your platform worth following in the first place.
You may have missed the original article, which prompted the reactions from Mr. Makis described in the current one:
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
I am sincerely glad to hear that your mother is doing better. But do you mean that her improvement resulted from Dr. Makisu2019s health coaching, or from protocols developed by Joe Tippens and many other researchers, which Mr. Makis has simply repackaged for profit?
For my part, I have received many testimonies from people who say Mr. Makis took their money without providing meaningful follow-up – and in some cases without even appearing for the initial meeting. I have also found that many of the accounts promoting his alleged success stories appear to be fake, with details changing over time, including which relative was supposedly saved.
Similar experience for my family. This article didnu2019t u201Clandu201D for me either, although at this juncture I wouldnu2019t recommend people give their money to Makis simply because my family has had ever worsening communication from Makisu2019 hired team now that he apparently has thousands of clients around the world. However he has been very open with his recommended protocols and you donu2019t need to pay him to get that information.
Absolute garbage!!! Iu2019ve been familiar with, and aware of Dr. Makis for years, and I DO NOT recognize the summary of his character, AT ALL! Unlike the author of that hit piece, I actually live in the same province and city proximity where he lived, so Iu2019m fully familiar with the people/ political/medical climate heu2019s had to deal with.
The opening statement alone was full of errors, and Iu2019m not 100% sure where the author harvested their bs, or what their motivation is, but its EXTREMELY transparent to me that they clearly have nefarious motives, which does not surprise me in the least.
Thereu2019s no u201Cunravelingu201D of Dr. Makis, as the author of this hit piece claims. Unbelievable.
PSA- I would suggest that people actually do their due diligence, and unfortunately most are what I refer to as, u201Clazy thinkersu201D. They just go by whatever somebody posts without researching the subject thoroughly for themselves, ad nauseam. Then, not only do you have to research it and spend hours sometimes days/weeks, you also have to take into account the authors possible preferences/motivations in making their claims and statements. This takes more time, which, in my experience, the author is counting on you not to do your own research, and to ensure that, they will conveniently provide you with their own u201Clinksu201D.
Unfortunately, this is the day and age we live in, to take anything at face value anymore, is setting oneself up for either minor disappointment, deception or something more dangerous.
I’m sorry that you’re so emotionally committed into this. I also worked with Albertan citizens during this investigation and they had a very different feedback from yours. Do you mean that you know Dr. Makis personally ?
Could you be a bit more specific when you say that “the opening statement alone was full of errors” and quote just one, so that we can address it specifically ?
Dr Yoho, Iu2019m disappointed with you! I honestly thought you could see the tree for the forest! You raised attention to a post of someone that hides their identity (who is OPENVAET???), you disclose that Midwestern doctor is a woman (sheu2019s trying to avoid it), and you donu2019t look into the evidence of cheap repurposed drugs in the treatment of canceru2026. and you ignore one very important point: that Dr Makis has given HOPE (and positives outcomes) to people and families that were abandoned by the classic medical institution you so much despise! I think you were conned by the Big Pharma lobby and you donu2019t even realise itu2026 poor you!
I am sorry if you have not come across my work before. We are all heavily shadow-banned in this field, so that is not especially surprising.
However, although I remain anonymous to everyone except my closest colleagues, I have a long track record of solid work that does not align with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry:
https://blog.openvaet.info/p/pfizerbiontech-c4591001-trial-audit
Could you identify a single factual claim in this current report that is not supported by direct evidence, before accusing Dr. Yoho of having been misled? I believe he has a strong ability to recognize an unpleasant truth when he sees one.
I have long been frustrated with Makisu2019 adversarial communication style and have had concerns with his ability to communicate with clients through his u201Cteamu201D since he no longer responds to emails directly, but this post has several red flags of its own.
1. Will OpenVAET identify him or herself, or simply remain anonymous?
2. I have been following Makis since the rollout of the covid vaccines and have never seen him recommend the vaccines or boosters.
3. The endless and rambling nature of the post is concerning; seems meant to waste the readeru2019s time and overwhelm with repetitive accusations. Many of the quotes and evidence appear incomplete and unclear unless you open endless new links; unlike Yoho, I donu2019t have two weeks to dedicate to one post. When someone has a legitimate case, itu2019s not that hard to synthesize everything into coherent, digestible threads.
4. I am in touch with people who have fallen out with Makis but still work with his protocol, citing overwhelming success. My own family member has gone on to live a healthy, normal life after a diagnosis of stage 4 thyroid cancer metastasized to their bones and liver. Once they started Makisu2019 protocol, they never went back to the mainstream cancer system, which wanted to radiate the thyroid, no consultation, no risk-benefit analysis. Diagnosis was June 2024. Doing well in 2026.
Agree Makis isnu2019t doing himself any favors of late, but this strikes me as an attack not to protect cancer patients, but to break the emerging alternative cancer treatment pathways. I have great respect for Robert Yoho. I will need to know more about who is behind the OpenVAET name.
1. No, I do not see why that would be necessary. I provide evidence for everything I say, so my identity should not be required in order to assess the substance of my work. That said, I have been active for years and have an excellent reputation among those I have worked with. You can click on my alias to find my other work, which goes back to early 2023 on Substack. For anything earlier, I would need to refer you to Archive.org, as I was banned from many platforms during COVID.
2. You can find the threads in which people expressed surprise at seeing him support the vaccine in a tweet he later deleted here: https://archive.ph/R5Jw8
The deleted tweet itself can be found here: https://blog.openvaet.info/i/191884539/2021-relative-calm-and-makiss-double-speech-on-covid-19-vaccines
3. That strikes me as a rather one-sided judgment. You write that u201Cmany of the quotes and pieces of evidence appear incomplete or unclear unless one opens an endless series of links.u201D Could you identify a single example that you believe fits that criticism?
4. That would be extremely important if true. Could you point to any published documentation? So far, everyone reporting Mr. Makisu2019s extraordinary success has failed to provide me with evidence that the events they describe actually took place.
Notice how @OpenVAET did not respond to you about who he/she/they are and who they are affiliated with. Hidden identies. @OpenVAET is controlled opposition from the dark side whose purpose is to defame and destroy Dr. Makis.
@OpenVAET, do not respond to me. Stop trolling this site.
Sorry if I’m late to the party or missed something in your post, but what is the mention of Makis and zoophilia all about?!
Hello Katherine,
It’s an admission of Mr Makis, assisted by his lawyer, that he discussed at the office to have masturbated his cat.
While discussing with the nurses he also sexually harassed.
Details here: https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
You should be ashamed of yourself for reposting this hit piece on Dr. Makis. This article is nothing more than BS – and controlled opposition trying to discredit and destroy a good doctor who has been working tirelessly to help cancer patients. Thank God we have him. The traditional medical community is the one FREAKING out because THEY are losing control of a system they have controlled for over a hundred years now that cancer patients are healing (with the help of Dr. Makis).
I understand that it’s a difficult read when you trusted someone, but I took great care in having “no BS” – and Makis himself hasn’t contested the facts.
You can verify for yourself if the posts he deleted really existed for example.
Could you point to one information insufficiently sourced?
@OpenVET – I did not respond to you and do not wish to receive your comments. I already heard your thoughts in that hit piece against Dr. Makis. Your article is trash. Question: Why are your trolling Yoho’s account? Obviously, this was a planned and coordinated attack by both of you on Dr. Makis.
Since my message was originally directed to Yoho, not you, I will conclude to Yoho that I am no longer subscribing to him. I no longer value is thoughts.
Well, perhaps you could wait for Dr. Yohou2019s own input before unsubscribing, rather than doing so just because I commented. Your decision seems a bit hasty.
Iu2019m keeping an eye on the comments here because I wrote the article that Dr. Yoho – whom I had never spoken to before – was kind enough to share.
Iu2019m fully aware of the backlash he will receive from Makisu2019s more hardcore supporters because of his courage.
@OpenVAET – not interested in your comments. Do not respond to me. Done with Yoho.
Yoho = controlled opposition