The psychopaths controlling them are trying to thin the herd, and the deadline for rejecting their proposals is December, 2023.
This is a James Roguski repost and my interview about the situation. The post is long, so click the title above to view this message in the Substack app.
Amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted at the 75th World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022.
There is an 18 month period during which the leader of every nation can REJECT the amendments under Article 61 of the International Health Regulations.
The deadline to reject the amendments (December 1, 2023) is rapidly approaching. NOW would be a very good time for YOU to speak up!
To my knowledge, not a single politician on Earth has spoken up against the amendments that were adopted on May 27, 2022.
A MESSAGE TO WORLD LEADERS:
Please watch the video below…
TRANSCRIPT
This notice is directed to the individual leaders (Presidents, Prime Ministers, Kings, Queens and yes the Pope) of each and every one of the 194 nations that are members of the World Health Organization, as well as Liechtenstein and the Holy See, which are observer nations that have also chosen to be legally bound by the International Health Regulations.
Please be aware that December 1, 2023 is the deadline for each and every one of you to reject the amendments to the International Health Regulations that were adopted by the 75th World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022.
Under Article 61 of the current International Health Regulations, each of you has the authority to send a simple notification to the World Health Organization informing them of your decision to reject the amendments for YOUR nation.
The amendments in question were submitted on May 24, 2022 by the following nations: Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, the European Union and its Member States, Japan, Monaco, the Republic of Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
The amendments were adopted just three days later on May 27, 2022, without any opportunity for public discussion, debate or comment.
Quite frankly, I wonder if the delegates from your nation have properly informed you of the ramifications of their actions.
I also wonder if you’ve been made aware of the existence of these amendments and the authority that you have to reject them.
I wish to remind you that, under Article 61 of the current International Health Regulations, you have the authority to reject the amendments that were adopted on May 27, 2022, but the deadline for you to take that official action is December 1, 2023.
I pray to God that you will receive this information and that you will possess the wisdom and exhibit the courage required to stand up to the World Health Organization in order to protect the rights and freedoms of the people of your nation.
I urge you to invoke your authority under Article 61 of the International Health Regulations and send an official letter to the World Health Organization informing them of your decision to reject the amendments that were adopted on May 27, 2022, and I urge you to take this action before the deadline on December 1, 2023.
I encourage everyone else in the world, especially those who speak languages other than English, to record this exact same message in your own voice and in your own language and post your video wherever you possibly can.
I also encourage everyone to share this video far and wide.
I believe that we, the people of the world can, and must unite in order to protect our unalienable rights and freedoms.
My name is James Roguski and I can be reached directly at 310-619-3055, and complete details regarding this issue can be found at StopTheAmendments.com
https://www.who.int/countries/
I appeared on David Spuria’s show to discuss this issue over 6 months ago…
Below are Articles 61 and 59 of the International Health Regulations:
The revised articles of the International Health Regulations can be found on pages 83-86 of the following document HERE.
The following version of the amendments seems to have disappeared from the WHO website.
Amendments Adopted On May 27 2022
276KB ∙ PDF file
Please read the articles below for additional details.
STOP THE AMENDMENTS
JUN 18
The People’s Guide to the Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations
The Peoples Guide To The Proposed Amendments To The International Health Regulations
1.36MB ∙ PDF file
TRUTH BOMB
Silence Procedure
The following official petitions have been ignored by EVERY member of the Parliaments in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.
Help Australia. Help The World.
Canadian Petition
APR 22
PETITION
APR 4
ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
ExitTheWHO.org
ExitTheWHO.com
StopTheGlobalAgenda.com
StopTheAmendments.com
StopTheWHO.com
ScrewTheWHO.com
MaskCharade.com
RejectDigitalEnslavement.com
HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com
PreventGenocide2030.org
DoorToFreedom.org
James Roguski:
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
Parting shot
World Homicide Organization.
Do you think they have good office parties?
Probably with pizza.
Probably pedophilia would be my guess as I have no doubt they’re involved in the trafficking issue.
For the Nth time…WHO, you and Teddy can go to hell.
They’re turning up the thermostat down there for these pigs.
Excellent information!! This is holocaust 2.0
The alternative scene is succumbing to LETS PANIC!
Sorry. Not doing it. Fk the WHO. And no, I don’t want to “replace” the WHO. I want them gone.
And the W.H.O. can deposit that needle in their hind quarters. If they want to take me out it is going to be a bit more difficult for them.
Theyu2019re not going to stop, but we sure as hell can.
I know, it’s a buzz kill. We have to work at what we can.
The rejection of medical slavery and big pHARMa begins right NOW.
The next step is to find the fraud hidden as facts that retards the practice of medicine. I would like to Ignite your research and scrutiny, there is much to rediscover.
I have an article titled:
We breathe air not oxygen.
Air is measured by its moisture/humidity.
Oxygen is measured by its dryness or lack of moisture.
Lungs require air to reach 100% humidity at the alveoli.
Medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination.
Can you see the mismatch?
Oxygen exists only as a manufactured product. There is zero oxygen or nitrogen in our atmosphere. Oxygen is manufactured from air. The process strips moisture whilst increasing pressure.
Research oxygen toxicity and ponder the effects as the dehydration of a dry gas interfering with a wet system.
Oxygen gas was a necessary invention for metallurgy as was nitrogen gas. Never a health measure. Oxygen is prescribed primarily to the terminally ill. Not for breathlessness.
What is air?
Air is bubbles.
What is water?
Water is full bubbles or drops.
If you stir water bubbles emerge. This is the interface between water and the atmosphere we call air.
The lungs rehydrate RBCs. Just as the saline drip rehydrates RBCs. Red blood cells are saline sponges.
Red light monitoring is checking hydration.
Dehydrated RBCs are dark.
Hydrated RBCs are light.
Why is flu and colds seasonal?
Cold air holds the least moisture in combination with more time spent indoors with drier air.
Dehydration is the primary insult that begets respiratory distress and the symptoms of colds/flu.
The known solution: salt water gargles and nasal rinsing to revive respiratory mucosa.
Lung health was healed with seaside sanatoriums. Inhalation of sea air restores the lung mucosa.
Lungs perform best: sea level atmospheric pressure, adequate salt in diet for hydration and 30-50% humidity.
Hyperbaric chambers aid lungs due to the increased pressure. Oxygen is always toxic due to itu2019s dehydrating effects.
Please read and comment.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jane333/p/we-breath-air-not-oxygen?r=ykfsh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I hope this is not considered off-topic, but I wanted to spread this video.
I think this is very relevant.
https://www.vacsafety.org/episode-92-the-yeadon-files/
Episode 92: The Yeadon Files
Share
Former Pfizer Scientist Speaks Out
August 31, 2023
“Former Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon sits down with VSRF Founder Steve Kirsch for a wide-ranging discussion on Big Pharma, the Covid-19 vaccine, and the Corporate-State censorship regime.”
I was a local activist against Agenda 21 and the United Nations WHO , eugenics, “NWO” almost 30 years ago. Had a bumper sticker Get US out of the UN etc.
As Dr. Yeadon PhD states repeatedly in this video the “table top simulations” , such as Event 201 in 2019 , Atlantic Storm etc., were part of the world planners agenda since at least the late 1990s.
Truth is our best secular weapon at this time. Only the One Who is Truth can help us now.
nothing is off topic
Could not resist one more comment.
When I say I have been in the “conspiracy corner” for almost 40 years, I am using the legitmate word conspiracy. I am a conspiracy researcher or analyst or whatever. I will never say I am a “conspiracy theorist.”
Latin word root of conspiracy – etymology
con Latin for with
spirare Latin for to breathe
A legal charge in USA law is involved in, so I have read, about 75 percent of all federal prosecutions law cases.
https://thelawdictionary.org/conspiracy/
Blackstone law dictionary – Coinspiracy
“In criminal law. A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing, by their joint efforts, some unlawful or criminal act, or some act which is innocent in itself, but becomes unlawful when done by the concerted action of the conspirators, or for the purpose of using criminal or unlawful means to the commission of an act not in itself unlawful.”
email a reply to this email with your phone number and we can chat.
best
A READER WROTE:
There are millions of us who tried everything we could think of to warn our loved ones to not get injected with the experimental so-called u201Cvaccineu201D only to find ourselves completely tuned out and even ostracized by the very people we were trying to protect.
A few of us were able to get through to a few of our loved ones before they lined up to be voluntarily Guinea pigs without giving serious consideration to any potential negative life-changing consequences of being injected with those shots.
Many of us watched in horror as some of our loved ones were harmed and even killed as a result of their choices.
In almost all cases, when pleading with our loved ones to do their own research (etc), we were told to mind our own business (u201CIu2019ll do me, you do you!u201D) and were even told that we were u201Cthe problem,u201Dwe were u201Cbeing selfish and didnu2019t care about others,u201D and that we were u201Cputting innocent lives in danger.u201D Iu2019m sure I donu2019t need to explain this further since weu2019ve all been through these disheartening experiences repeatedly!
Personally, Iu2019ve lost touch with several people including family members who have been quite vocal about how u201Cstupidu201D and u201Cirresponsibleu201D my beliefs have been regarding the shots and everything else that occurred during the pLandemic and is continuing to happen now (and is going to happen in the future unless we do something to protect ourselves and make it stop.)
Even now, despite all the evidence that has been collected regarding the dangers of the shots, for example, many of these people still refuse to admit they made a mistake and should have listened to us instead of listening to the so-called u201Cexperts,u201D the bureaucrats, the u201Cscientistsu201D, doctors, Pharma, and their bought-and-paid-for media sellouts.
For example, both my brother, who is a dentist and his wife, a teacher are intelligent, well-educated people. At one point, right before their first shots and then their second doses, they stopped reading any of the articles I sent them and our open conversations about the shots and any subject related to the pandemic ceased.
From time to time I still send them information Iu2019ve carefully selected with the hope that they might read it. I believe that the subject of this email is something that they might be interested in hearing about. However, as soon as they read the words u201Ckill vaxu201D they would not read any further. That alone would be enough to prejudice them against anything the article has to say.
I think itu2019s important to keep this in mind when writing or discussing any of these important issues. We donu2019t need to convince ourselves or others like ourselves who are already aware of the dangers we face.
These articles must be written for people like my brother and sister-in-law who still believe that we are u201Cconspiracy theoristsu201D or are on the fringe of the social norm despite evidence to the contrary. I believe they now know about the lies and the disinformation they were told, as well as the dangers of the shots that are being exposed pretty much on a daily basis and they might be willing to look into whatu2019s really been happening behind closed doors in addition to the truth about the shots.
In my opinion, using words like u201Ckill vaxu201D (even though it is a truthful description) and other controversial words wonu2019t help get these important points across to the masses who need to learn more about whatu2019s really happening.
I think that when we clutter up our messages with the wrong words (usually due to our passion and knowledge about the subject) it comes across as though we ARE way over the top and perhaps even delusional! Thatu2019s when they lump us in with the u201Cflat-earthersu201D and believers of the existence of u201Clizard people running the world.u201D (My condescending brother actually sent me articles about those things, insinuating that I was in the same category!) If weu2019re not careful with our wording, our intentions and intelligent messages get lost and their minds close down even tighter. We donu2019t want to give them any excuses to not want to hear what weu2019re saying.
I know that Iu2019m not the greatest writer or communicator, but I hope my letter has been able to help convey my important message.
We are at the u201C11th houru201D and thereu2019s obviously not much time left to bring awareness to the rest of the masses.
I REPLIED:
Your points are well taken, and maybe I should change my style. The headlines were mine. I have heard your point of view before and I have colleagues who still write about “the mistakes that were made.” Itu2019s hard for me to characterize genocidal maniacs as making mistakes that accidentally killed millions.
HEREu2019S WHERE I ASK FOR SUGGESTIONS: Maybe someone here will come up with a useful strategy and at least we can debate it. Best to all.
I really hate to say this, but if the dentist and wife havenu2019t u201Cgotten itu201D by now the only way they will ever u201Cget itu201D is if they encounter some serious side effect themselves. Thatu2019s it. Theyu2019re hard core zealots. Euphemisms be damned. Full speed ahead.
exactly
The New World Order sucks.
Sovereign individuals are NOT subject to arbitrary rules, posing as law, published by unelected institutions. We need to remember that implied consent is worthless and would stand up in no court of law which deals in real justice.
see above
I still do not understand how this is even remotely constitutional. Itu2019s a treaty. Treaties must be passed by 2/3 of the Senate to be binding. That isnu2019t going to happen. WHO has zero jurisdiction here. What am I missing.
go through James Rogusky’s substack